Adaletsizliğin Hükümranlığı

Abstract

Abstract The discussion about justice is neither realized through obtaining a social methodology nor the truth based conceptual analysis, rather the discussion is a result of the loss of truth that means the facts of injustice prior to the ideal one. This article tries to find an attitude against the sovereignty of injustice in neo-capitalist societies that are full of stimuli by making a comparison between the philosophy of law and sociology of law. This comparison stands against injustice that may stem from ignoring conceptual and factual differences; and also this comparison suggests a broader philosophical-sociological approach of justice between theory and praxis for the science of law. Unfortunately, the majority of the people accept the suspicion injustice situation as a permanent situation. The acknowledgement of injustice in discussions has been realised concurrently with the legitimacy of social inequality. Özet Adalet kavramının ne olması gerektiği, hangi kavramlarla bağlantılı olduğu ve hangi yöntemlerle tartışılacağı sosyal bilimciler tarafından yeteri kadar önemsenmemiştir ve onlar sadece adaletsiz durumları tartışma konusu olarak belirlemişlerdir. Bu tartışmalarda kavramın önüne olgusallık geçmiştir ve bu durum hakikatin yitirilmesine yol açmıştır. Bu çalışmada geç kapitalist uyarıcılarla dolu toplumlarda adaletsiz durumlara yönelik tavrın ne olması gerektiğine ilişkin felsefi ve sosyolojik bakış arasında yanıtlar aranacaktır. Böylelikle dikkat çekilmek istenen, kavramsal ve olgusal adaletin farklılıkları göz önüne alınmaksızın hukuk bilimince konu edilmesinin daha büyük adaletsizliklere yol açabileceğidir. Dahası, adaletsizlikten günümüz için kastedilen müphem ancak kalıcı ve yığınlarca kabul edilmiş bir durumdur. Adaletsizliğin tartışma alanında sıradanlaşması toplumdaki eşitsizliğin meşrulaştırılması ile eşzamanlı gerçekleşmiştir.

Authors and Affiliations

Güncel Önkal

Keywords

Related Articles

Val Plumwood and Animist Materialism

Val Plumwood, who is known by Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, is an important name of ecofeminism. She focused on hyper-separations that are in the core ecological problems in her early writings, and then developed h...

Changing Position of Turkey in terms of International Migration Regime: Institutional Approaches and Theoretical Expansion

In this study, Turkey's changing position in terms of the international refugee regime will be examined in the framework of corporate responsibility and role distribution. Based on the on geopolitical analysis, Turkey,...

Kairopolitics: Towards a Temporal Critique of Capitalism

As existential realities and ontological foundations of our lives, time and space shape our perception toward the social and the universe; they are also shaped by this perception. Time and space, as phenomena that are so...

From Plato to Strauss: The Role of Noble Lie in the Constitution and the Protection of the Order

In this study, what the aim is to explain the noble lie that has an important function in respect to constitute and protect the order in Plato’s Politeia. For that purpose, the study is separated to three parts. In the f...

Securitization of Migration: Rising of Radical Right Wing Party 'AfD' in Germany and Syrian Refugee Crisis

Hosting the largest number of refugees in Europe, Germany has witnessed the strongest reactions against immigration. This study examines how the AfD, with the change of its party manifesto and leadership, has manipulated...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP256891
  • DOI -
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Güncel Önkal (2017). Adaletsizliğin Hükümranlığı. ViraVerita: Peer-reviewed E-Journal of Interdisciplinary Encounters, 6(), 1-15. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-256891