Effect of National Decisions on Actions for Competition Damages in the CEE Countries

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 15

Abstract

One of the main objectives of the so-called Damages Directive (2014/104/EU) was to make antitrust enforcement more effective. Although in most EU countries private antitrust enforcement has been possible subject to general rules of civil law; the number of private antitrust litigations has remained relatively low. It is presumed that the complementary roles of public and private enforcement, as well as the synergy between them, will take effect if formal decisions taken during public enforcement will have binding effect with regard to follow-on private litigations. According to the Damages Directive, final national decisions on competition infringements shall have binding effect in follow-on litigations. What is to be understood under ‘binding effect’, and the potential effects thereof, has been subject to alively debate among academics and practitioners. It has been questioned if decisions of an executive body can bind the judiciary, and if so, to what extent. What is the evidentiary value of aformal decision of a NCA regarding national courts, but also on the court of another Member State. The article deals with the main issues and arguments presented in the general debate on the binding effect of national competition law decisions, and provides a closer look on this topic with regard to specific CEE countries.

Authors and Affiliations

Evelin Pärn-Lee

Keywords

Related Articles

Proving the Grounds for Compensation – Reflections on Private Enforcement in the Polish Cement Cartel Case. Case Comment to the Judgment of the Court of Appeals in Cracow of 10 January 2014 (Ref. No IACa 1322/13)

Despite the fact that the right to full compensation of harm caused by the breach of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU was confirmed in European Union jurisprudence many years ago,and that actions for damages for competition law...

Overview of Kazakhstani New Anti-monopoly Regulation

The main statute governing competition in Kazakhstan is the Entrepreneurial Code, first adopted in October 2015. Section 4 of the Code in particular is aimed at the protection of competition in Kazakhstan...

Conference on EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from its implementation. Uppsala, 13–14 June 2017 (conference report)

On 13–14 June 2017, a two-day conference entitled ‘EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from its Implementation’ was held at Uppsala University (Sweden). The c...

Liability for Anti-Competitive Conduct of a Third Party under EU Competition Law

The article discusses the framework of liability for anti-competitive conduct of a genuinely independent third party as set forth in relevant judgments. It refers to concepts of third party liability in the light of the...

The Role of Economic Efficiency in Competition Law

The main focus of the paper is the function of economics in the current application of competition law. While advocating further economization of the law, it is seen as necessary to widen the extent to which aspects of e...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP319464
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.9
  • Views 47
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Evelin Pärn-Lee (2017). Effect of National Decisions on Actions for Competition Damages in the CEE Countries. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 10(15), 177-196. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-319464