A clinical study of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair

Abstract

become the standard of practice for inguinal hernia management, the same has been adapted for Umbilical hernia management with better outcome. There is still debate going on regarding the better surgical approach. There are very few prospective studies comparing the laparoscopic and open method of Umbilical hernia mesh repair. This study compared the short term outcomes following laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of Umbilical hernia. Methods: Patients who underwent Umbilical hernia repair at Victoria hospital, Bengaluru between July 2015 to January 2017 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups, those who underwent Laparoscopic repair were considered into “group A” and those who underwent Open repair were considered into “group B”. Both the groups were compared with respect to Duration of surgery, Use of Drains, complications like wound infection, seroma, and haematoma, Return to normal activity, Duration of hospital stay. Results:A total of 96 patients underwent umbilical hernia repair out of which 88 were included as 8 patients underwent primary suture repairs.Out of 88 patients 49(55.68%) patients underwent Laparoscopic mesh repair [Group A] and 39(44.32%) patients underwent open mesh repair. Duration of surgery is relatively less in Group B, Use of Drains, Complications like wound infection, seroma and haematoma is significantly less in Group A, Duration of hospital stay is relatively less in Group A, Return to normal activity is faster in Group A. Conclusion: Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is a safe and effective technique. Laparoscopic mesh repair required in shorter duration of surgery, less use of postoperative drains, faster return to normal activity and less complications rate, shorter hospital stay.

Authors and Affiliations

Abhinava D. M, Shashidhar Naik C, Seshagiri Rao K, Santhosh C. S, Mallikarjuna N Manangi, Niranjan Nagaraj

Keywords

Related Articles

Clinical outcomes in metaphyseal locking plate fixation of distal femur and proximal tibia fracture

Introduction: Fracture of distal femur and proximal tibial are often difficult to treat and associated with many complications. We aimed to assess the clinical and radiological union time and functional outcome in fractu...

Orthogonal dual plating for fracture of base of 1st metacarpal- original study

Background: Treatment of fractures of the base of 1st metacarpal is controversial with multimodality of implant choice available like k wire and miniplates. Secondary displacement rates are higher if fracture is not fixe...

Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection in perforated duodenalulcer in a rural hospital

Background: The association of Helicobacter pylori with uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease is well documented. The aim of this study was to observe the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer perforation and...

Platelet lymphocyte ratio a diagnostic challenge in pancreatic head masses

Background: Masses in head of pancreas may arise from Carcinoma head of pancreas or Chronic pancreatitis. There is a need for differentiating the type of pancreatic head masses with utmost priority, since it can convert...

Laparoscopic appendicectomy in higher grades of appendicitis

Introduction: Complicated appendicitis has higher morbidity and mortality than non-complicated appendicitis. Despite of many clinical studies and meta-analyses of the various studies it remains confusion for the surgeons...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP265128
  • DOI 10.17511/ijoso.2017.i4.11
  • Views 168
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Abhinava D. M, Shashidhar Naik C, Seshagiri Rao K, Santhosh C. S, Mallikarjuna N Manangi, Niranjan Nagaraj (2017). A clinical study of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair. Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics, 3(4), 157-141. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-265128