A commentary on the Supreme Court’s Judgment of October 19, 2016 (Ref. No. III CZP 5/16)

Journal Title: Debiuty Naukowe Studentów Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej - Year 2017, Vol 17, Issue

Abstract

The problem of the transfer of warranty for physical defects to a third person has been analysed for many years by very respectable lawyers and judges. It seemed that the Supreme Court had solved the problem by its verdict of 5 February 2004. However, the Supreme Court in its judgement of 19 October 2016 admitted that the right to withdraw from an contract of sale involving a faulty product can be transferred to the recipient. The purpose of the commentary is to analyse the content of Supreme Court’s verdict.

Authors and Affiliations

Krzysztof Świątczak

Keywords

Related Articles

Selection of features from a passenger information system, relating to tram stops, using the example of public transport in Poznan

The paper presents a model of selecting features for the passenger information system of tram stops in the public transport system. Within this paper, the author has developed quantitative and qualitative criteria, which...

Intellectual capital accounting

The subject of this study is to investigate the possibility of recognition of intellectual capital in financial reports. This concept is an attempt to classify and measure the intangible assets which value, according to...

Ewolucja instytucji upadłości konsumenckiej w latach 2009–2016. Szanse i zagrożenia

Niniejszy artykuł opisuje problem odzyskiwania należności od dłużników ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem okresu 2014–2016 w Polsce, kiedy to nastąpiła duża nowelizacja obowiązującego wcześniej prawa upadłościowego i naprawcz...

Personality traits as a source of employee competences

Human resources have a significant influence on an organisation’s effectiveness. When analysing an individual’s effectiveness and professional success, it makes sense to focus on human personality. The purpose of this ar...

The influence of recruiter behaviour on candidate stress during an interview

The stress felt by candidates during interviews, affects an optimal presentation of their competence, an adequate recruiter evaluation, and builds a negative image of the potential employer. This article is an attempt to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP298419
  • DOI -
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Krzysztof Świątczak (2017). A commentary on the Supreme Court’s Judgment of October 19, 2016 (Ref. No. III CZP 5/16). Debiuty Naukowe Studentów Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej, 17(), 199-206. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-298419