A comparative study between clonidine and dexmedetomidine in attenuation of pressor response during endotracheal intubation

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

Aims 1To study and compare efficiency of clonidine and dexmedetomidine to reduce haemodynamic response ie attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with single premedication dose2 To evaluate dose sparing effect of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on induction agentMaterials and Methods 60 patients physical status ASA grade I and II were randomized into two groups C and D n 30 in each group Group C received 1gkg of clonidine while group D received 1gkg of dexmedetomidine preoperatively over 10 minutes before induction through syringe infusion pump Each patient was induced with injection Thiopentone sodium until loss of eyelash reflex After check ventilation succinylcholine 2 mgkg was given followed by tracheal intubation Anaesthesia was maintained with O2 N2O5050 and Vecuronium supplemented with isoflurane Hemodynamic parameters were recordedResults We observed no statistical difference in heart rate blood pressure systolic diastolic and mean arterial pressure between the two groups from baseline up to induction between two groups Group C had higher readings of HR SBP DBP and MAP compared to group D after intubation upto 3 min which was statistically significant Induction dose of thiopentone was lower in dexmedetomidine group and was statistically significantConclusion Dexmedetomidine attenuated the hemodynamic pressor response and also reduces the dose requirement of thiopentone sodium and was superior to clonidineKeywords Clonidine Dexmedetomidine Premedication Pressor response

Authors and Affiliations

Ganesh Nikam, Madhukrishna N.

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect of oral low dose pregabalin on succinylcholine induced fasciculations and myalgia -A prospective randomized double blind placebo-controlled study

IntroductionAmong the depolarizing muscle relaxants Succinylcholine is the widely used depolarizing agent until today in anaesthesia practice Side effects like hyperkalemia fasciculations myalgia increased intracranial p...

A prospective study of associated surgical hazards in trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor (turbt) comparing blind versus nerve stimulator guided obturator nerve block with spinal block

Introduction: Bladder cancer is the ninth most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The overall incidence has increased by 10% since last 30 years and 5 years survival rate by 50% in European countries.1 Transurethral re...

Comparison of I-gel and Proseal LMA for airway management in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation - A prospective, randomized, single blind clinical study

Introduction The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway PLMA and Igel are two novel supraglottic devices available for airway management and can be used safely in paediatric patients The primary aim of our study was to compare th...

Intraoperative sedation during regional anaesthesia (Caudal epidural anaesthesia) in paediatric patients: Role of intravenous dexemedetomidine

Introduction To avoid adverse effects of general anaesthesia regional anaesthesia RA techniques are increasingly being practiced in children for different surgeries These RA techniques are often combined with moderate de...

A comparative study of efficacy and safety of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as premedicant for paediatric cardiac catheterization

Use of an effective sedative premedicant significantly minimizes the emotional trauma associated with perioperative anxiety and its sequelae Currently oral midazolam is the most commonly used premedicant in most of the c...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP476461
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0045
  • Views 94
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ganesh Nikam, Madhukrishna N. (2018). A comparative study between clonidine and dexmedetomidine in attenuation of pressor response during endotracheal intubation. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(2), 244-248. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-476461