A comparative study of the rule of unjustified enrichment in Egypt and Iran

Abstract

An unfair acquisition or using without any reason has been accepted as a new source of commitment. In foreign law and in the Romeo- Germanic system it was positioned beside contract and civil responsibility of fault. This rule that nobody can be prosperous on another's loss had been a moral rule that find its way in the legal system. The entrance of this rule into the legal system was due to the lack of specific solution in the quarrels that occurs between demanding and demanded. And the demanded hasn’t done any fault but it was unfairly on the loss of wealthy demanding. The moral and fair foundation of this rule caused this rule to be accepted in most of the legal systems. Although In Egyptian and Iranian law there is no source for accepting this rule but for confirmation of this law some lawyers have used the foreign and Islamic Law. By studying and applying a comparative analysis of this rule in Iran and Egypt in a historical framework and also of its foundation which is an independent organization and the consequences of this rule we can understand that it has been coined for the sake of bridging the gap of legal rights in the Romeo- Germanic system.

Authors and Affiliations

Nasrin Alipour

Keywords

Related Articles

The Effect of Strategic Planning on Employees' performance, Hospitals Social Security Organization; Case Study: Kashani Hospital in Tehran

Purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of strategic planning on performance (effectiveness) is Tehran Ayatollah Kashani hospital staffAbout where the research is Tehran Ayatollah Kashani hospital. The sample...

Equality before the law from Imam Ali’s viewpoint

Equality, in fact, is the most fundamental issue in the Islamic worldview and one of the branches of the robust tree of Tawhid. Equality aims at eliminating discrimination and moving toward human ascendency. Therefore, t...

The Effect of Co-Teaching on Improving EFL Learner's Reading Comprehension

This study aimed at examining whether co-teaching strategy could maximize EFL students' reading comprehension more than the traditional single person teaching. To fulfill the study, 90 female students were selected from...

The Relationship between Religious Attitudes and Marital Satisfaction among married personnel of departments of education in Rasht City, Iran

Marital satisfaction is the objective feeling of satisfaction and pleasure from spouse, considering all aspects of marriage. Religious attitude is known as one of the factors that can be associated with marital satisfact...

An Examination of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership with Entrepreneurial Orientation in Organization (Case Study: Mobin Petrochemical Company- South Pars)

Transformational leaders, use personal capabilities of individuals to promote peoples' ideals and lead individuals and organizations a higher point of transformational performance. This research aims to investigate the r...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP637734
  • DOI -
  • Views 129
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nasrin Alipour (2012). A comparative study of the rule of unjustified enrichment in Egypt and Iran. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 1(0), 209-218. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-637734