A comparison of perspectives on costs in emergency care among emergency department patients and residents

Journal Title: World Journal of Emergency Medicine - Year 2017, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Costs of care are increasingly important in healthcare policy and, more recently, in clinical care in the emergency department (ED). We compare ED resident and patient perspectives surrounding costs in emergency care. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study using surveys and qualitative interviews at a single, academic ED in the United States. The two study populations were a convenience sample of adult ED patients (>17 years of age) and ED residents training at the same institution. Participants answered open- and closed-ended questions on costs, medical decision making, cost-related compliance, and communication about costs. Closed-ended data were tabulated and described using standard statistics while open-ended responses were analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Thirty ED patients and 24 ED residents participated in the study. Both patients and residents generally did not have knowledge of medical costs. Patients were comfortable discussing costs while residents were less comfortable. Residents agreed that doctors should consider costs when making medical decisions whereas patients somewhat disagreed. Additionally, residents generally took costs into consideration during clinical decision-making, yet nearly all residents agreed that they had too little education on costs. CONCLUSION: There were several notable differences in ED patient and resident perspectives on costs in this U.S. sample. While patients somewhat disagree that cost should factor into decision making, generally they are comfortable discussing costs yet report having insufficient knowledge of what care costs. Conversely, ED residents view costs as important and agree that cost should factor into decision making but lack education on what emergency care costs.

Authors and Affiliations

Keywords

Related Articles

The “PAWPER-on-a-page”: Increasing global access to a low-cost weight estimation system

BACKGROUND: The PAWPER tape is one of the most accurate weight estimation systems available today, but international access to the tape is limited because it has no commercial distribution. For this reason, the "PAWPER-o...

Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis of 2260 patients with cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether ext racorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), improves outcomes in adult patients with ca...

Establishment of trauma registry at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Blantyre, Malawi and mapping of high risk geographic areas for trauma

BACKGROUND: Less attention is directed toward gaining a better understanding of the burden and prevention of injuries, in low and middle income countries (LMICs). We report the establishment of a trauma registry at the A...

Management of polytrauma patients in emergency department: An experience of a tertiary care health institution of northern India

BACKGROUND: In a tertiary care institute of northern India, the emergency department receives an average of 6–7 patients with poly trauma every day. Of these patients, some come directly and many are referred from other...

Urgent tracheostomy: four-year experience in a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND: Urgent airway management is one of the most important responsibilities of otolaryngologists, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Urgent surgical airway intervention is indicated when an acute airway...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP466917
  • DOI -
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

(2017). A comparison of perspectives on costs in emergency care among emergency department patients and residents. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 8(1), 39-42. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-466917