A Naturalistic Account of Free Will (II)
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2014, Vol 11, Issue 0
Abstract
Several arguments based on neuroscience have been proposed against the possibility of free will. I have pointed out that those arguments against free will depend first on arguments against the existence of the self. According to Rodolfo Llinás’s case against the self, for example, since no experience-centralizing area exists in the brain, and since our sense of self is thus an internal perception that could not correspond to any such brain area, the self does not exist. But I have shown against Llinás, as well as against Daniel Dennett and others, that their objections against the self are only applicable against a conscious self, the sort of notion that fits well with Cartesian philosophy. Nevertheless, in this age of neuroscience there is no reason to theorize on the basis of such a notion. Given that the mind is biological, so should the self. We must then reason on the basis of a biological notion of the self, i.e. on the basis of a notion compatible with neuroscience in the context of evolutionary biology. When we do so, we come to realize that the self, which performs many functions involving many areas of the brain, is a distributive mechanism — it need not be centralized at all. We also come to realize that the self is also mostly unconscious, and that our sense of self, being an internal perception, as Llinás himself pointed out, is subject to illusions. But we ought not to confuse the sense of self with the self any more than we ought to confuse the perception of an elephant with the elephant. Given the biological conception of the self I defend, a plausible case can be made that, given also my notion of strong emergence, that the self does indeed determine the person’s actions. This ought to be the proper approach to the problem of free will, as previously pointed out by Gary Watson.
Authors and Affiliations
Gonzalo Munévar
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP163635
- DOI -
- Views 128
- Downloads 0
Defining Undesign in a Designed Universe
The argument from design, recast today in the Intelligent Design movement, relies critically on the contrast of designed things with undesigned things. This poses a problem for Christians, however, because they affirm th...
Philosophical Aspects of the so-called „Kansas Affair”
The aim of the article is the presentation and analysis of some events of 1999. During the routine process of updating the state school teaching standards in Kansas (USA), the group of local creationist activists (mostly...
Filozoficzne zarzuty stawiane hipotezie inteligentnego projektu: odpowiedź na krytykę
Autor jest zwolennikiem teorii inteligentnego projektu, która - w jego ujęciu - głosi, że pewne systemy biochemiczne zostały zaprojektowane przez jakiegoś inteligentnego projektanta. Rozpatruje kwestię falsyfikowalności...
Kreacjonizm młodej Ziemi a koncepcja Big Bangu. Poglądy Johna Hartnetta z konstruktywistycznej i eksternalistycznej perspektywy
Dr John G. Hartnett, fizyk posiadający publikacje w czasopismach naukowych głównego nurtu, jest kreacjonistą młodej Ziemi i mocno sprzeciwia się teorii Big Bangu. Uważa on, że rozszerzania się przestrzeni, o czym mówi ta...
The Discussion on Adam Grobler’s paper, „The Explanatory Weaknesses of Intelligent Design Theory”
This text is the record of the discussion on Adam Grobler’s paper, „Słabości eksplanacyjne teorii inteligentnego projektu” [The Explanatory Weaknesses of Intelligent Design Theory], conducted by the employees of Universi...