A Novel Approach for Systematic Literature Reviews Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Journal Title: Journal of Intelligent Management Decision - Year 2024, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

This study investigates the application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods to the classification of research papers within a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Distinctions are drawn between compensatory and non-compensatory MCDA approaches, which, despite their distinctiveness, have often been applied interchangeably, leading to a need for clarification in their usage. To address this, the methods of Entropy Weight Method (EWM), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were utilized to determine the parameters for ranking papers within an SLR portfolio. The source of this ranking comprised publications from three major databases: Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. From an initial yield of 267 articles, a final portfolio of 90 articles was established, highlighting not only the compensatory and non-compensatory classifications but also identifying methods that incorporate features of both. This nuanced categorization reveals the complexity and necessity of selecting an appropriate MCDA method based on the dataset characteristics, which may exhibit attributes of both approaches. The analysis further illuminated the geographical distribution of publications, leading contributors, thematic areas, and the prevalence of specific MCDA methods. This study underscores the importance of methodological precision in the application of MCDA to systematic reviews, providing a refined framework for evaluating academic literature.

Authors and Affiliations

Vilmar Steffen, Maiquiel Schmidt de Oliveira, Flavio Trojan

Keywords

Related Articles

High-Performance Carbon Cycle Supply Data Sharing Method Based on Blockchain Multichain Technology

In the evolution of blockchain technology, the traditional single-chain structure has faced significant challenges, including low throughput, high latency, and limited scalability. This paper focuses on leveraging multic...

A Robust Framework for Renewable Energy Policy Evaluation Using MCDA and Compromise Ranking with Stochastic Weight Identification

Evaluating renewable energy policies is crucial for fostering sustainable development, particularly within the European Union (EU), where energy management must account for economic, environmental, and social criteria. A...

Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analyses on Green Supplier Selection in an Agri-Food Company

The way agri-food companies conduct business has changed as a result of changes in the market. These companies must start working in a more environmentally friendly manner. This study aims to examine, assess, and compare...

Evaluating Supply Chain Efficiency Under Uncertainty: An Integration of Rough Set Theory and Data Envelopment Analysis

The evaluation of supply chain (SC) efficiency in the presence of uncertainty presents significant challenges due to the multi-criteria nature of SC performance and the inherent ambiguities in both input and output data....

Analysis of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing the Human Resource Practices

The lethal coronavirus illness (COVID-19) has evoked worldwide discussion. This contagious, sometimes fatal illness, is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. So far, COVID-19 has quickly spread t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP752384
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd030205
  • Views 31
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vilmar Steffen, Maiquiel Schmidt de Oliveira, Flavio Trojan (2024). A Novel Approach for Systematic Literature Reviews Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 3(2), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-752384