A prospective randomized control trial -Comparison of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation – Macintosh versus McCoy blade

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: As is well described laryngoscopy and intubation produce significant hemodynamic response. It is shown in previous studies that type of laryngoscope blade used affects the degree of hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation. In our study we have attempted to compare hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation using Macintosh and McCoy blade. Aim: Our aim was to perform comparative study of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation using Macintosh versus McCoy blade. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study comparing hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation using Macintosh and McCoy blade was conducted. A total no. of Sixty patients, either male or female, between age group of 20 -50yrs, belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiology physical status I and II requiring General anaesthesia were randomly allocated to either group A (Macintosh group) or group B (McCoy group) In both the groups, standard methods were used. Comparison of hemodynamic parameters i.e. Heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) diastolic (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MAP) was done at induction, during laryngoscopy and intubation, till 5 mins after intubation. Statistical Analysis: Hemodynamic changes in between the two groups were compared statistically using Unpaired “t” tests. Results: Significant rise in all HR, SBP, DBP, MAP was seen in both the groups after laryngoscopy and intubation. In group A the rise was found to be statistically significant as compared to group B. Conclusion: This study helped us to conclude that McCoy blade produces reduced hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to Macintosh blade.

Authors and Affiliations

Madhavi R. Godbole, Girish Saundattikar

Keywords

Related Articles

A study to evaluate comparative efficacy of two different venous occlusion duration on pretreatment with Inj. lignocaine to prevent propofol Inj. pain in patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia

Aim To study the efficacy of two different time duration of venous occlusion in preventing propofol injection painMaterials and Methods In this prospective randomized controlled study patients of either gender scheduled...

A randomized controlled study of intraperitoneal vs intraincisional infiltration of local anesthetic levobupivacaine for pain relief in post-laparoscopic hysterectomy cases

Introduction and Aim: Providing postoperative pain relief is a common acceptable practice in modern era. Multimodal combination methods are being used to reduce opioid-related side effects. We conducted a randomized stud...

Postoperative delirium – Review Article

Postoperative delirium is a common but often a missed complication following major surgery in elderly patients. Early diagnosis, treatment with non-pharmacological means, and drug treatment reduces complications, so also...

Hip replacement in a patient of sickle cell disease: an anaesthetic challenge

Majority of surgical procedures in patients with sickle cell disease are a result of the disease process itself and require intervention for either treatment or prevention of certain complications. Avascular necrosis of...

C-MAC D-blade laryngoscope: A saviour for difficult intubation in lateral position

Video laryngoscopes are the latest addition in an anaesthesiologist’s armamentarium. They are comparable to fiberoptic bronchoscope in terms of ease of visualization of vocal cords especially in awake intubation and in t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP472891
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0018
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Madhavi R. Godbole, Girish Saundattikar (2018). A prospective randomized control trial -Comparison of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation – Macintosh versus McCoy blade. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(1), 110-113. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-472891