A prospective, randomized, double blind, systemic controlled trial to compare analgesic efficacy of clonidine and fentanyl in supraclavicular block with 0.75% ropivacaine

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction and Object Fentanyl and clonidine mostly used as adjuvant to improve quality and duration of nerve block In present study we compared clonidine and fentanyl perineurally and systemically in Supraclavicular Brachial plexus blockMaterials and Methods Sixty eight patients were randomly assigned into four equal groups scheduled for upper limb surgery They received the drugs in Supraclavicular block and intravenous route as below Group A 24 ml 075 ropivacaine 1 ml fentanyl 50gml 5ml normal saline in block and 1ml normal saline intravenously Group B 24 ml 075 ropivacaine 6ml normal saline in block and 1ml fentanyl 50g ml intravenously Group C 24 ml 075 ropivacaine 1ml clonidine 150gml 5ml normal saline in block and 1ml normal saline intravenously Group D 24ml 075 ropivacaine 6ml normal saline in block and 1ml clonidine 150gml intravenouslyResults Onset of sensory and motor block was significantly earlier in Group C 1247257 min 1800346 min than in Group A 1465341 min 1994261 min respectively p005 between Group A 741094hrs and Group B 735093hrs while it was prolonged in Group C 894097 hrs than Group D 812122 hrs pConclusion Fentanyl perineurally or systemically administered have comparable results while perineural clonidine offered prolonged duration of analgesia better than when it was used intravenously suggesting its local actionKeywords Supraclavicular Block Ropivacaine Clonidine Fentanyl

Authors and Affiliations

Garima Tyagi, Muni Ram Meena, Hemraj Tungria, Anisha Banu, Lalit Kumar Raiger

Keywords

Related Articles

A randomized controlled parallel study of nalbuphine and fentanyl on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopic and laparoscopic stress in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy under general anaesthesia

Aims Hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy endotrachial intubation and creation of pneumoperitonium in laparoscopic surgeries is deleterious to patients This study was done to compare nalbuphine an agonist antagonis...

Comparison of intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone or with dexmedetomidine or tramadol for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Introduction: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine alone or with dexmedetomidine or tramadol for relief of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and Methods: The pati...

Role of intravenous paracetamol as an adjunct to epidural analgesia in immediate postoperative period in abdominal cancer surgeries

Aims and Objectives: To evaluate analgesic efficacy and side effects of intravenous paracetamol, also assess IV-PCA morphine consumption in patients undertaken abdominal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Total 160 A...

A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two different doses of intravenous Nitroglycerine for manual removal of placenta

Introduction After the birth of the baby if the placenta is not expulsed within 30 minutes of the delivery it is termed as retained placenta The incidence of retained placenta is 2 of deliveries worldwide and is an impor...

A study on postoperative analgesic effects of intra articular ropivacaine and femoral nerve block in unilateral total knee replacement surgery

Introduction: Pain after total knee replacement surgery if not taken care of properly may interfere with early mobilization and recovery process. Infiltrating an anesthetic agent in the joint at the end of surgery is gai...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP476499
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0099
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Garima Tyagi, Muni Ram Meena, Hemraj Tungria, Anisha Banu, Lalit Kumar Raiger (2018). A prospective, randomized, double blind, systemic controlled trial to compare analgesic efficacy of clonidine and fentanyl in supraclavicular block with 0.75% ropivacaine. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(4), 518-522. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-476499