A randomized, prospective, comparative study to evaluate the haemodynamic changes of 3ml of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine and 3ml of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic surgeries

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine have been recently introduced in India, Although levobupivacaine is theoretically more potent than ropivacaine, clinical studies show conflicting results in terms of anesthetic and analgesic characteristics. Many studies have showed that equipotent doses of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine have similar efficacy in peripheral nerve plexus block and epidural anesthesia in ambulatory patients, as well as when administered by topical application or local infiltration. Not many studies have been done in India comparing the use of isobaric Levobupivacaine 0.5% and isobaric Ropivacaine 0.5% for spinal anaesthesia. Hence the present study was undertaken to evaluate the haemodynamic changes of 3ml of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine and 3ml of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients ndergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Materials and Methods: Group A (n=30) received Levobupivacaine 0.5% and group B (n=30) Ropivacaine0.5%. Heart Rate, SBP, DBP, MAP were recorded at various time intervals Results: There is no statistically significant difference in the mean heart rate and the mean diastolic blood pressure between the two groups at various time intervals. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups for mean systolic blood pressure except at 80th and 90th minutes. Clinically there was no significant hypotension necessitating the administration of injection mephenteremine. There is no statistically significant difference in mean arterial pressure between the two groups except at 70th, 80th and 90th minutes. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in heart rate, DBP monitored at various intervals between the 0.5% isobaric Levobupivacaine (15 mg) group and 0.5% isobaric Ropivacaine (15 mg) groups in patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Though inter group difference in SBP at 80th and 90th min and in MAP at 70th, 80th and 90th min was statistically significant, it was clinically insignificant as there was no need to use vasopressor.

Authors and Affiliations

Suresh S B, Prasanna Kumara V R

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of post spinal anesthesia hearing loss:A hospital based study

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is one of the most frequent regional anaesthesia techniques in surgical interventions, being used in all procedures below the umbilicus. Hearing loss following spinal anaesthesia is a known...

Study of intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol for post operative analgesia in infra umbilical surgery

Background: Relief of postoperative pain is a major concern for patients and anaesthesiologists. Postoperative analgesia has traditionally been provided by opioid analgesics. However, recent trend is to use opioid free a...

A study to compare the effects of supraclavicular perivascular technique and infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade for below elbow surgeries

Background: The brachial plexus provides the motor innervations and nearly all the sensory supply of the upper limb. Supraclavicular block is one of the most widely used techniques of brachial plexus block. At the latera...

Comparative study of intubating conditions after rocuronium bromide and succinylcholine: A randomised controlled double blinded study

Background and Aims: Succinylcholine is most commonly used muscle relaxant to facilitate rapid sequence endotrachealintubation. When Succinylcholine is undesirable or contraindicated, we have to use non-depolarizing musc...

A study of haemodynamic response on low dose dexmedetomidine infusion in laparoscopic surgery

Background: Dexmedetomidine is a potent and highly selective α-2 adrenoceptor agonist with sympatholytic, sedative, amnestic and analgesic properties which has been described as a useful and safe adjunct in many clinical...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP416307
  • DOI -
  • Views 201
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Suresh S B, Prasanna Kumara V R (2018). A randomized, prospective, comparative study to evaluate the haemodynamic changes of 3ml of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine and 3ml of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 7(3), 148-153. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-416307