About the question of the correspondence of the self-preservation to the self-defense of the property rights in Ukraine
Journal Title: Проблеми законності - Year 2017, Vol 139, Issue 139
Abstract
The issue of protection and its relationship with self-defense is relevant in the legal literature due to the absence of clear criteria for their differentiation and existence of sharp discussions of civilians. Some civilists emphasize that the concepts of “defense” and “protection” do not coincide (O. M. Nechaeva, I. M. Osolinker). It is not accidental that there is no such term as “self-protection”. In general, self-defense and self-protection may reflect definite stages of the mechanism of protection development as a reaction to the wrongful acts of the subjects of law. By installing security means and / or mechanisms, the subject thereby protects his/her rights and legitimate interests. The author believes that the proposed criterion and approach in general is rational, since preventive mechanisms (devices, appliances, equipment, etc.) can independently carry out protective functions and inform about the violations of the rights of the subject (or threat to violation of his rights) after the prevention of such threat, or termination of the violation itself. All means of protection can be divided into striking, locking, signaling and of mixed types. The responsibility of the owner of such means before the persons who have suffered from the corresponding damage will be decided depending on the presence of signs of unlawfulness in the actions of such persons. In the absence of unlawfulness, the damage is compensated by the owner of the protective means in a full amount, and in the presence of an offense, this issue is solved taking in account the limits of self-defense in determining the means of protection with the means of self-defense. Thus, when security mechanisms (devices, appliances), reacting to a violation of law (the threat of its violation), prevent such a violation, they can be considered as a means of self-defense.
Authors and Affiliations
Людмила Ляшевська
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP244599
- DOI 10.21564/2414-990x.139.115350
- Views 84
- Downloads 0
TO THE QUESTION ABOUT LEGAL PERSONALITY OF HOLDINGS
The scientific article describes the legal problem of tax legal personality of holding companies. The raised issue is actual because of fact that within the tax legislation there is no definition of the holding as a tax...
European Defence Community: origins of integration in the defence sphere
There is a tendency among non-historians to force «practioners» of the discipline to justify why the study of a particular episode of the past is so important and to articulate the lessons to be learned from the experien...
Недійсність договору: законодавче регулювання та види
Досліджено питання недійсності договору. Проаналізовано проблематику законодавчого регулювання і видів недійсності договору крізь призму судової практики. Доведено необхідність установити загальні правила щодо оспорюванн...
International mechanisms for the protection of the right to life in armed conflicts
The article is devoted to the actual topic of international mechanisms for the protection of the right to life in international and non-international armed conflicts. The increase in the number of armed conflicts in the...
ЗАГАЛЬНОТЕОРЕТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПРАВОВОЇ СВІДОМОСТІ ЯК КАТАЛІЗАТОРА РОЗВИТКУ ПРАВОВОЇ СИСТЕМИ УКРАЇНИ
Розглянуто зміст поняття правової свідомості з огляду на сучасні наукові напрацювання з цієї проблеми. Проаналізовано взаємозв’язки правосвідомості та правової системи у контексті євроінтеграційних процесів в Україні. Ар...