Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 6

Abstract

People generally adhere to the norm of reciprocity during both tacit and negotiated exchange. Emotional responses generated from profitable and unprofitable exchange facilitate the formation of motives to settle scores with others. In two studies we examine how exchange incidents trigger positive and negative emotional responses, bargaining behavior, and process. In Study 1, we developed measures of emotional response toward the counterpart that can index the state of relational accounts between parties. In a complex, multi-issue negotiation, The measures show that prior profitable or unprofitable exchange experiences shifted affect and individual social motives, as well as initial bargaining positions. In Study 2, shifts in relational accounts altered the bargaining process and subsequent implementation of agreements. The relational accounting concept represents an important link for understanding how negotiation functions as a sub-process in the wider stream of social exchange.

Authors and Affiliations

Alexandra A. Mislin, Peter A. Boumgarden, Daisung Jang and William P. Bottom

Keywords

Related Articles

Disentangling the effects of alternation rate and maximum run length on judgments of randomness

Binary sequences are characterized by various features. Two of these characteristics—alternation rate and run length—have repeatedly been shown to influence judgments of randomness. The two characteristics, however, have...

The gambler’s fallacy in retrospect: A supplementary comment on Oppenheimer and Monin (2009)

Oppenheimer and Monin (2009) recently found that subjectively rare events are taken to indicate a longer preceding sequence of unobserved trials than subjectively common events, an effect which they refer to as the retro...

Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me

Consumers make trade-offs when they choose between utilitarian and hedonic products. The former is practical, instrumental, and functional, whereas the latter is sensational and experiential. Prior research shows that pe...

The effects of surrounding positive and negative experiences on risk taking

Two experiments explored how the context of recently experiencing an abundance of positive or negative outcomes within a series of choices influences risk preferences. In each experiment, choices were made between a seri...

Is variety the spice of life? It all depends on the rate of consumption

Is variety of the spice of life? The present research suggests that the answer depends on the rate of consumption. In three experiments, we find that, whereas a variety of stimuli is preferred to repetition of even a bet...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678207
  • DOI -
  • Views 128
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alexandra A. Mislin, Peter A. Boumgarden, Daisung Jang and William P. Bottom (2015). Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678207