Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 6

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that consistency between people's behavior and their dispositions has predictive validity for judgments of regret. Research has also shown that differences in the personality variable of action orientation can influence ability to regulate negative affect. The present set of studies was designed to investigate how both consistency factors and action-state personality orientation influence judgments of regret. In Study 1, we used a recalled life event to provide a situation in which the person had experienced either an action or inaction. Individuals with an action orientation experienced more regret for situations involving inaction (staying home) than situations involving action (going out). State-oriented individuals, however, maintained high levels of regret and did not differ in their regret ratings across either the action or inaction situations. In Study 2, participants made realistic choices involving either an action or inaction. Our findings revealed the same pattern of results: action-oriented individuals who chose an option that involved not acting (inaction) had more regret that individuals who chose an option that involved acting (action). State-oriented individuals experienced high levels of regret regardless of whether they chose to act or not to act.

Authors and Affiliations

Todd McElroy and Keith Dowd

Keywords

Related Articles

Belief bias and representation in assessing the Bayesian rationality of others

People often assess the reasonableness of another person’s judgments. When doing so, the evaluator should set aside knowledge that would not have been available to the evaluatee to assess whether the evaluatee made a rea...

Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues

Previous research on anchoring has shown this heuristic to be a very robust psychological phenomenon ubiquitous across many domains of human judgment and decision-making. Despite the prevalence of anchoring effects, rese...

Reference-dependent preferences and loss aversion: A discrete choice experiment in the health-care sector

This study employs a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) in the health-care sector to test the loss aversion theory that is derived from reference-dependent preferences: The absolute subjective value of a deviation from a r...

Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing

We conducted three studies to investigate how well pictographs communicate medical screening information to persons with higher and lower numeracy skills. In Study 1, we conducted a 2 (probability level: higher vs. lower...

The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking

We investigate decision-making in the Judge-Advisor-System where one person, the “judge”, wants to estimate the number of a certain entity and is given advice by another person. The question is how to combine the judge’s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677591
  • DOI -
  • Views 167
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Todd McElroy and Keith Dowd (2007). Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677591