ACTUAL ISSUES OF TIME-TIME CANCELLATION APPLICATION AS A PROCESS OF PROVISION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Journal Title: Юридичний науковий електронний журнал - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue
Abstract
The article is devoted to a thorough investigation of the actual issues of the application of such a measure to ensure the criminal proceedings as a temporary withdrawal of property, as well as its features. The paper identifies the main problems that exist in the domestic criminal procedural law when applying the relevant normative provisions of the current Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, as well as ways of overcoming them. The article focuses on the fact that during the implementation of legal regulations regulating the use of such an event as a temporary withdrawal of property, it is necessary to specify in detail the legal status of persons – owners of temporarily seized property. The conclusion is made that the specified procedural status should be fixed in a separate article of the CPC. The article analyzes the grounds provided by law and the procedure for the application of temporarily seized property. It is proposed to determine the expediency of establishing in the law a list of specific procedural actions, during which some property may acquire a status temporarily withdrawn. It is emphasized that the legal regime of the relevant property is defined as “temporarily seized property” only in cases where such property was obtained as a result of apprehension, search and review. Provided scientifically substantiated proposals and recommendations for improving the procedure for the application of this measure to ensure criminal proceedings during the pre-trial investigation. The detailed description of the terms, during which it is necessary to send to the investigating judge a petition for the seizure of temporarily seized property, taking into account the existing law enforcement practice. It is recommended to resolve the decision of the investigating judge, the court on the return of the petition of the investigator, the prosecutor for the seizure of the seized property, if it does not meet the requirements specified by law. The reasons and features of the order of return of the temporarily seized property to a person are carefully investigated.
Authors and Affiliations
С. В. , Давиденко
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP480090
- DOI -
- Views 98
- Downloads 0
RESPONSIBILITY OF JUDICIAL REPRESENTATIVE IN THE CIVIL LEGAL PROCEEDING FOR THE IMPROPER REALIZATION OF ITS FUNCTIONS
This article concerns the question of judicial representative’s responsibility in case of improper implementations of his functions. The question of judicial representative’s responsibility for improper implementations o...
CONFLICT ISSUE INHERITANCE TO CONCEIVE, BUT UNBORN PERSON
This article is devoted to conflict of regulation associated with inheritance of a conceived but unborn person in private international law. The article examines the legal status of a conceived but unborn person as of ri...
JUDICIAL REFORM IN UKRAINE AND ITS EFFECT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL STATUS OF ECONOMIC JUDGES
The article is devoted to the coverage of one of the topical theoretical and practical problems of judicial reform in Ukraine, which was carried out with the aim of improving the efficiency of human rights protection, ac...
THE INFLUENCE OF MILITARY LAW ON THE FORMATION OF A LEGAL STATE
The article deals with theoretical and methodological principles of legal regulation of social relations in the formation and development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Was proved that at the present stage of formation...
RESPONSIBILITY OF ENGINEERING CONTRACT
This article explores the features of the civil liability of the engineering contract, analyzes the theoretical design of responsibility. This provides a detailed analysis of the views of other researchers, as well as th...