Addition of Fentanyl to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for Caesarian section – effect on dose of local anesthetic and duration of postoperative analgesia – a randomized comparative study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 20, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for the caesarian section for its reliability and ease of administration. However, it is limited by fixed duration of anesthesia, hypotension and lesser control of block height. The combination of a reduced dose of local anesthetic agent with intrathecal opioid makes it possible to achieve adequate spinal anesthesia with minimum hypotension and prolonged postoperative analgesia. The study aims to monitor the effect of intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine on reduction of higher blocks and simultaneously improving the quality and avoiding higher doses of local anesthesia agents. Methods: Forty patients scheduled for elective caesarian section were divided in to two groups of twenty each. Group I patients received Bupivacaine 12.5 mg (0.5%) for spinal anesthesia and group II patients received combination of Bupivacaine 8.5 mg (0.5%) with fentanyl 25 mcg. Patients were observed for hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, pruritus, quality of surgical anesthesia and duration of postoperative analgesia. Results: All the patients had adequate surgical anesthesia for the procedure and in no patient conversion to general anesthesia was required. Peak sensory level was higher (T2-T3 vs T4-T6) and motor block was more intense in the regular dose bupivacaine group of patients. More patients in bupivacaine only group developed hypotension and the requirement of vasopressors was significantly higher than the low dose bupivacaine with fentanyl group. Also the Visual analogue scale score for pain was less in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group, who received less postoperative analgesics for first twelve hours. Conclusions: We conclude that the combination of low dose bupivacaine (8.5mg) with fentanyl provides adequate surgical anesthesia for caesarian section and with low incidence of hypotension and nausea. Also, addition of fentanyl helps in prolongation of postoperative analgesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Ghulam Mohammed Mir, Mohammed Abdul Haadi

Keywords

Related Articles

Detection of AmpC-β lactamase Enzymes by AmpC DiscTest

Microbes have many mechanisms of unresponsiveness to antimicrobial agents that may arise in them over months or years. Among them, degradation of antibiotics by enzymes is one of the common methods of bacterial resistan...

Successful Pregnancy After IUI with Retrograde Ejaculated Sperm

Objective: To report a case of successful treatment of complete retrograde ejaculation by superovulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI), by collecting spermatozoa from post-ejaculatory urine. Design: Case report....

Myths About Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) in Kashmiri diabetics

Methods:- 50 patients of diabetes who were attending OPD Endocrinology Department were taken randomly over 3 months in the study. patients were enquired about the diet they were avoiding or taking with the belief of Glyc...

Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone -- Promising rescue in septic Shock:

Septic shock is defined by a dysregulated host response to infection, resulting in life-threatening circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities. The short-term mortality is approximately 45-50%, and around half of...

Prevalence of Lipitension in Kashmir North India: A Hospital-Based Study

2 years hospital based prospective study was undertaken. 200 patients of hypertension and 150 normotensives were studied for abnormal lipid parameters. 72% hypertensives and 63.3% of normotensives were found to have Dysl...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP431534
  • DOI -
  • Views 69
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ghulam Mohammed Mir, Mohammed Abdul Haadi (2017). Addition of Fentanyl to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for Caesarian section – effect on dose of local anesthetic and duration of postoperative analgesia – a randomized comparative study. Journal of Medical Sciences, 20(2), 62-68. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-431534