Admissibility of imposing a fine for late submission of the application for approval of tariffs by the energy company. Gloss to the Supreme Court’s judgment of 13 January 2016. III SK 6/15
Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 4
Abstract
Presented gloss concerns the theme of the admissibility of imposing a fine by the President of URE on energy company, which admittedly has submitted to regulatory authority tariffs for approval, but did so within the time limit that does not ensure its compliance with the provisions of approval, publication and entry into force before the end of the period for which previous tariff has been approved. In this judgment the Supreme Court advocates the use of language interpretation of rules and changes the point of view expressed in its earlier judgment of 2004. Gloss is critical of the decision taken by the Supreme Court. It discusses the views of doctrine and jurisdiction, pointing to the flaws in the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the grounds of the judgment.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Michał Kruszewski
“Higher Education and Legal Studies at the Time of Entry of the New Law into Force” Organised by the Editorial Board of “Critique of Law” on December 5, 2018 at Kozminski University
“Higher Education and Legal Studies at the Time of Entry of the New Law into Force” Organised by the Editorial Board of “Critique of Law” on December 5, 2018 at Kozminski University<br/><br/>
[i][b]Umowa w trybie art. 9 ustawy o własności lokali a umowa deweloperska [/b][/i]
Pliny the Younger and the problem of translatio cadaveris
In the correspondence between the governor of Bithynia-Pontus and emperor Trajan in the years 111–113 one can find an exchange on whether to allow a buried body to be exhumed and transported to be buried in a different p...
The importance of transparency for democracy
Sweden’s Freedom of the Press Act of 1766 (Tryckfrihetsförordningen), the world’s very first legislation supporting freedom of the press and freedom of information, is part of the country’s constitution and grants today...
[b][i]Accessibility, Inclusion, Egalitarianism. Are They also in Jurisprudence and Legal Education?[/i][/b]