Aktualne problemy postępowania pojednawczego
Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2018, Vol 75, Issue
Abstract
The text refers to the evolution and problems with interpretation of provisions of conciliatory court proceeding in Polish law. Conciliatory court proceeding is regulated by articles 184–186 KPC (The Civil Proceedings Code). Author considers the role of that institution and indicates that although there was not many amendments in above provision of law there was some important court decision relating to this proceeding. Also views of doctrine is still developing. Contemporary conciliatory court proceeding can be used to the all cases that could be terminated by agreement also these that are non-litigious proceedings. It should be noticed that in practice the main role of the conciliatory court proceedings is to interrupt the limitation period. However part of the subjects in civil procedure use the institution contrary to law. They are not interested in agreement but they want only to interrupt the limitation period multiple time to keep their claim. Such way of using conciliatory court proceeding should be treated as abuse of law. Author also shows how important is right classification of conciliatory court proceeding. It can even influence the proper learning process at University. Finally there are presented proposed amendments in law prepared in Government’s Draft of 27th November 2017 relating to the conciliatory court proceeding. Author assumes that conclusion of agreement in conciliatory court proceeding is proper way to finish dispute between the parties. It gives possibility to reduce costs, time and even make people to forget and reconcile animosity.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Marcin Mikołaj Ciesliński
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP401862
- DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0012.6907
- Views 118
- Downloads 0
Zawezwanie do próby ugodowej. Brak skutku przedawnienia terminu przedawnienia
An important problem of practical application of the law is invalid perpetuated judicial practice. It connects call for mediation with art. 184 of the Civil Code, with the effects of limitations of art. 123 § 1 of the Ci...
Partnerstwo publiczno-prywatne a porozumienie administracyjne. Efektywna realizacja zadań własnych administracji publicznej w ujęciu porównań systemowych
This publication focuses on defining the legal nature of the constructions of public-private partnership and administrative agreements under different legal systems, with particular emphasis on Polish regulations. Due to...
Placing “Lone-actor Terrorism” in Context. Who Are We Dealing with and What Threat Do They Pose? Preliminary Results of the FP7 PRIME Project
The author presents the de-classified preliminary findings of the European Commission funded FP7 research project PRIME, dealing with extremism, radicalization and lone-actor terrorism (also known as “lone wolf terrorism...
Obsada godności Muftiego Muzułmańskiego Związku Religijnego a zasady Konstytucji RP
In the Muslim Religious Union there is a dispute over the establishment of the Mufti office. From 2016, a schism has arisen in this religious community. This situation is a source of challenges for the authorities of the...
Zwolnienie z konstytucyjnego wymogu kontrasygnaty – rozważania na tle niekontrasygnowanych obwieszczeń Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej o wolnych stanowiskach sędziego w Sądzie Najwyższym i Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
On June 29, 2018 in Dziennik Urzędowy “Monitor Polski” (the Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland) were published two announcements by the President of the Republic of Poland – from May 24, 2018, on the vacant posit...