Are groups more likely to defer choice than their members?
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 3
Abstract
When faced with a choice, people can normally select no option, i.e., defer choice. Previous research has investigated when and why individuals defer choice, but has almost never looked at these questions when groups of people make choices. Separate reasons predict that groups may be equally likely, more likely, or less likely than individuals to defer choice. We re-analyzed some previously published data and conducted a new experiment to address this question. We found that small groups of people tended to defer choice more often than their members would. Assuming that the groups used a plurality rule but gave additional weight to individual preferences to defer choice allowed the groups’ responses to be predicted quite well. We discuss several possible explanations of these findings.
Authors and Affiliations
Chris M. White, Sebastian Hafenbrädl, Ulrich Hoffrage, Nils Reisen and Jan K. Woike
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677795
- DOI -
- Views 147
- Downloads 0
Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians’ evaluations of new treatments
Physicians expect a treatment to be more effective when its clinical outcomes are described as relative rather than as absolute risk reductions. We examined whether effects of presentation method (relative vs. absolute r...
A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations
We study whether probability weighting is observed when individuals are presented with a series of choices between lotteries consisting of real non-monetary adverse outcomes, electric shocks. Our estimation of the parame...
Game interrupted: The rationality of considering the future
The “problem of points”, introduced by Paccioli in 1494 and solved by Pascal and Fermat 160 years later, inspired the modern concept of probability. Incidentally, the problem also shows that rational decision-making requ...
A new test of the risk-reward heuristic
Risk and reward are negatively correlated in a wide variety of environments, and in many cases this trade off approximates a fair bet. Pleskac and Hertwig (2014) recently proposed that people have internalized this relat...
Reflection increases belief in God through self-questioning among non-believers
The dual-process model of the mind predicts that religious belief will be stronger for intuitive decisions, whereas reflective thinking will lead to religious disbelief (i.e., the intuitive religious belief hypothesis)....