Arguments for Treating CRISPR-Edited Persons as Vulnerable

Journal Title: Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications - Year 2022, Vol 5, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper is composed of four parts. In the first part is briefly described the origin of germline genome editing technology and its unique characteristics. The second part discusses germline genome editing is ethically unjustifiable today because of the unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The third part argues that CRISPR-edited persons ought to be treated as a vulnerable. The fourth part is to argue that people in the present generation have moral obligations to future generations.

Authors and Affiliations

Ruipeng Lei* and Renzong Qiu

Keywords

Related Articles

The Influence of the Sophists on Rousseau's Thought

The Sophists were the creators of an important Enlightenment movement in ancient Greece, which characterized an era of great spiritual activity centred on the city of Athens in the 5th century BC. Century, in which time...

Why Most Indian Young Women are Unhappy with Their Sex Lives

Women who habitually monitored their appearance, and for whom appearance determined their level of physical self-worth experienced lower sexual satisfaction. Skin in the game and one out of three Indian women cheat on th...

Ethical Principles on the Freedom of Speech and Expression in the Developed and Developing Countries

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is an essential part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, obstructing the free exercise of religi...

The Delegated-Cooperative Democracy as an Alternative to the Crisis of Contemporary Democratic Policies

This article aims to analyze the issue of democracy the delegated cooperative democracy as an alternative to the crisis of contemporary democratic policies. At first, the theoretical premises that guide the theoretical f...

The Use of AI in a Pandemic Emergence: A Biolegal Discourse in the International Arena

The pandemic has resulted in an emergency situation that has called into question not only health perspectives but also shared values and established rules. The critical question being how best to face up to this cultura...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745658
  • DOI 10.23880/abca-16000241
  • Views 45
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ruipeng Lei* and Renzong Qiu (2022). Arguments for Treating CRISPR-Edited Persons as Vulnerable. Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications, 5(3), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-745658