ART AND PREHISTORY<br /> <br /> (Visiting the Gaydarska and Chapman’s Answers to Why were Prehistoric Persons Interested in Rocks, Minerals, Clays and Pigments?)<br />

Journal Title: Acta Terrae Septemcastrensis - Year 2009, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

This reflection on art and prehistory introduced several author’s anthropological concepts on origin of art and its function in prehistory. Initial conceptual construct is the difference between aesthetic and aesthetical cultural views, respectively of aesthetic as a scientific theory (= aesthetics in singular) and aesthetics (plural) as the pleasing appearance or effect of things. The aesthetic view empowers and liberates culture while aesthetical view may limit it. The aesthetic view can be destructured while the aesthetical view needs to be proved. From the perspectives of prehistory, the socioanthropological power-prestige model does not allow to analyze the aesthetic view in its completeness and connectiveness as an essential enculturational construct. It may better explain the interrelation between socialization and aesthetic/aesthetical view. The cultural relation to rocks, minerals, clays and pigments was in fact relation of artists (understood as creative people) to nature in order to interact and create cultural products that in turn connected the people and nature. The art was invented in particular, to connect the gradually self-developing social world with the nature and in such way to make the world look united and complex.

Authors and Affiliations

Nikolova Lolita

Keywords

Related Articles

TĂRTĂRIA: A RITUAL-GRAVE TO CONSECRATE A NOVEL ANCESTOR IN A NEOLITHIC MEDIUM-SCALE COMMUNITY

&nbsp;In the Middle Neolithic of Southern-Central Europe, not every corpse received individual and partial secondary burial in a sacralized pit-grave. Even rarer was the re-deposition of a hybrid body made of selected sk...

&nbsp;Building archaeological museums as protagonists of Virtual reality

&nbsp;How to migrate high motivated museum institutions to virtual museums online, even if they are affected by inadequate ICT competences, low Web presence and restricted financial resources? The article discusses the m...

&nbsp;Neolithic and Cooper age Signs – methodology of translations

&nbsp;The purpose of this article is to present the methodology of the translations made in the F-MU.S.EU.M. Project, concerning the topic of Neo-Eneolithic signs on the territory of Romania. Furthermore, a new research...

SOME KEY FEATURES OF THE DANUBE HOMO SCRIBENS <br /> BASED ON THE DATABANK DATDAS<br />

This presentation provides documentary and statistical evidence concerning the inventory, fabric, pattern of features and organizational principles of the Danube script established upon the results of the databank DatDas...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP102347
  • DOI -
  • Views 128
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nikolova Lolita (2009). ART AND PREHISTORY<br /> <br /> (Visiting the Gaydarska and Chapman’s Answers to Why were Prehistoric Persons Interested in Rocks, Minerals, Clays and Pigments?)<br /> . Acta Terrae Septemcastrensis, 8(1), 7-15. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-102347