Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Proximal Composite Resin Restorations Performed with or without Magnification
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 12
Abstract
Introduction: Composite resins are the most frequently used direct tooth coloured restorative materials. Their use in the posterior teeth has increased because of their improved mechanical performance and wear resistance. However, marginal leakage is one of the major concerns for composite failures especially in the gingival margins of posterior teeth which leads to subsequent failure of the restoration. So, under magnification good integrity can be ensured by maintaining the ergonomics. Aim: To compare the effect of magnification on the marginal integrity of proximal composite resin restorations. Materials and Methods: Non-bevelled proximal slots (4.1x4x2.5) mm were prepared on the mesial surfaces of extracted mandibular first molars (N=40) for this in vitro study conducted over a period of one week in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics at Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n=20) based on the use of magnification: Group1, direct vision and Group 2, magnification with dental operating microscope. After establishing proximal contacts, the slots were restored with composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Mumbai, India) using a sectional matrix system (Palodent Plus Sectional Matrix System Kit, Dentsply, Caulk, US). The margins were analysed using an environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The data was statistically analysed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (p<0.05). Results: Indicate that the difference in marginal quality of gingival margin was significantly influenced by magnified vision when compared with unaided direct vision (p<0.05). However, the difference was not statistically significant between the groups in relation to buccal and lingual margins. Within the groups, Group 1 showed a higher percentage of gaps in gingival margins as compared to buccal and lingual margins. Whereas, in Group 2, the marginal gaps in both lingual and gingival margins were higher than buccal margins. Conclusion: The marginal integrity of proximal composite restorations can be improved when performed under magnification.
Authors and Affiliations
Pallavi Reddy, Vallari Jain, Mamta Kaushik, Dr. Roshni, Neha Mehra, Ritu Rana, Mona Yadav
Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for Better Learning in Pre-clinical Medical Education: A Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT Introduction: Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) can serve as a useful and timely diagnostic and therapeutic mechanism for tiding over learning issues created during classroom instructions. Aim: P...
Post Procedure Effects of Diagnostic Rigid Cystoscopy
ABSTRACT Introduction: Cystoscopy is an important diagnostic tool in the field of urology. It may be performed with either rigid or flexible endoscopes. However, post procedure complications are more commonly observed a...
Aggressive Angiomyxoma in Males
Paratesticular aggressive angiomyxoma is a very rare tumour in males. Most of documented cases of aggressive angiomyxomas have been seen in genital, perineal and pelvic regions in women of child bearing age. We report tw...
Closed External Fixation for Failing or Failed Femoral Shaft Plating in a Developing Country
Introduction: Femoral shaft fractures are one of the common injuries that is treated by open reduction, with internal fixation by plate and screws or intramedullary nailing, which can achieve a high union rate. Aim: To e...
Ureteric Obstruction due to Aberrant Vessel Masquerading as Retrocaval Ureter
Abstract Aberrant vessels, although rare, may extrinsically compress ureter which on imaging may masquerade as retrocaval ureter. The exact cause of obstruction in such atypical cases can be confirmed intraoperatively....