ASSYMETRIC WARFARE - NOT EVERY WAR HAS TO END?
Journal Title: UNKNOWN - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 11
Abstract
The study of warfare, throughout its history, as well as efforts to legally regulate the resort to war and the conduct of war, were concentrated exclusively on one form of warfare - interstate conflict. Only since the terrorist attacks on Washington and New York in 2001 and the following ‘Global War on Terrorism’ has a discussion on a potentially new kind of warfare - asymmetric warfare - moved into the spotlight. Despite all the scientific attention, the concept of asymmetric warfare remains undefined or ill-defined until today, resulting in a proliferation of its use and limiting its value. Hence, restraint in the use of the term is necessary, in order to reinforce its analytical value and applicability. Defining asymmetric warfare as a conflict among opponents who are so different in their basic features that comparison of their military power is rendered impossible, is such an attempt to limit the term to a substantially new form of warfare, witnessed in a conflict that is often commonly called the Global War on Terrorism. The past two years, since the upsurge of the so-called Islamic State to the forefront of the salafi jihadi movement, have witnessed a significant change in this war. Superficial analysis could lead to the conclusion that the proclamation of the Islamic Caliphate on the territories of Iraq and Syria (for now) seems to have recalibrated this conflict into traditional interstate war again, making the concept of asymmetric warfare obsolete and diminishing it into just a short-term aberration in the history of warfare. Nothing could be further from the truth. The enemy in the Global War on Terrorism was and remains a global and territorially unrestricted ideological movement whose numbers cannot even be estimated, which fights its battles wherever it chooses to, and whose ultimate goal is the annihilation of the international system of sovereign states, not the creation of a new state within this system. The Islamic Caliphate in its current boundaries is nothing more than the “model Islamic state”, as envisioned by Osama bin Laden in his 1996 fatwa as part of Al Qaeda’s 200 year plan for the establishment of God’s Islamic World Order. This grand strategy is the guiding blueprint of the salafi jihad that is waged against the Westphalian state system in a war that is truly asymmetric. We have to adjust to this strategic asymmetry if we are to prevail in this struggle, fighting a long war against an indefinable enemy on battlefields that are still unknown.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Zrinko PETENER
APPLICATION OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN COMPUTER ASSISTED EXERCISE (CAX)
This paper shows a model for applying geographic information systems (GiS) in the Computer assisted exercise through the eSriCompany’s arcreader program of the arcGiS 10 application. The arcreader program provides access...
Scientific Information in the didactics of National Defence University
Recently we have been witnesses to the creation of information society. Knowledge is becoming the most important value of the contemporary civilization. Scientific Information Centres and libraries equip their collection...
“FRONTEX- THE ONLY ORGANISATION THAT FIGHTS FOR EUROPE AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS”
In the world we live in there are lots of conflicts and a large majority of people don’t even know how serious they are. Wars that are ongoing in African and Asian territories are causing refugees to mig...
RULES FOR THE TRANSFER OF WEAPONS AND MILITARY TECHNOLOGY IN THE LIGHT OF CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW
<i/>This study investigates the contents of key documents of international rank regulating the transfer of weapons and military technologies in order to mark the principles that rule this kind of state activity. The foll...
Communiqué on the participation of Defence Academies and Security Studies Institutes in the PfPC Annual Conference Partnership for Peace Consortium (June, 2014)