Berkeley on Voluntary Motion: A Conservationist Account

Journal Title: Ruch Filozoficzny - Year 2018, Vol 74, Issue 4

Abstract

A plausible reading of Berkeley’s view of voluntary motion is occasionalism; this, however, leads to a specious conclusion against his argument of human action. Differing from an unqualified occasionalist reading, I consider the alternative reading that Berkeley is a conservationist regarding bodily motion by the human mind at will. That is, finite minds (spirits) immediately cause motions in their body parts, albeit under the divine conservation. My argument then comports with the conservationist reading from three perspectives: (i) theodicy that the human mind is held liable for sinful actions; (ii) an account of the human mind influencing other minds; and (iii) an improper but necessary directing principle of the human mind. This article is a stepping stone to grasping why the conservationist reading is more coherent than the occasionalist one.

Authors and Affiliations

Takaharu Oda

Keywords

Related Articles

Human dignity in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant - and the experience of Auschwitz

The aim of this article is to analyze the Kantian concept of human dignity, which in the history of philosophy, especially after the Holocaust experience, has undergone significant changes. The three concepts presented h...

Dwa projekty antynaturalizmu metodologicznego na przykładzie filozofii Heinricha Rickerta i Ernsta Cassirera

Dwaj filozofowie przełomu wieków, Heinrich Rickert (1863–1936) oraz Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945) przynależą do licznego i niejednoznacznego w swych poglądach, ruchu neokantystów. Chociaż filozofia Immanuela Kanta stanowi d...

Adam Smith on Philosophy and Religion

The recent rediscovery of Adam Smith by philosophers has led a debate about the place of religion in his moral philosophy. The debate about the extent to which Smith’s philosophy depends on religious arguments is probabl...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP493517
  • DOI 10.12775/RF.2018.039
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Takaharu Oda (2018). Berkeley on Voluntary Motion: A Conservationist Account. Ruch Filozoficzny, 74(4), 71-98. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-493517