[b] Assessment of Rural Farming Households WTP for Fertilizers and Agrochemicals in Kwawara State, Nigeria[/b]

Abstract

 Given the specific geographic and spatial location of rural areas in developing countries, to bring agrochemical to the rural farming households, it is argued, may have to come at a cost over and above the normal price it is sold in market. To this end, this work focuses on the willingness of rural farming households to pay more than the mean average regional retail price for agrochemicals in Kwara state, North Central Nigeria. Questionnaire was administered to 100 randomly sampled in the two agricultural development zones (ADP) in the study area. Descriptive statistics and the Logistic Binary Regression model were fitted to examine factors that influence respondents’ decision to pay more than the prevailing average prices for access to agrochemicals in the study area. Findings indicated a high level of awareness of agrochemical use and modal responses to quantities used include: fertilizers (41-50Kg/ha), herbicides (<10liters/ha), and pesticides (<10liters/ha) on the cultivation of yam, cassava and maize, which were the dominant arable crops in the study area. About 90% of the respondents purchase agrochemicals from their personal savings and less than 10% of the respondents got their agrochemicals from other sources (governmental, developmental agencies, ADP and farmers’ cooperative). Furthermore, 88% (p<0.01) of the respondents indicate willingness to pay more than the current average price to have access to agrochemicals and the logistic regression reveals that level of education (P<0.01), had a positive relationship with respondents’ to willingness to pay more for agrochemicals in the study area. Recommendations were made towards encouraging expanded use of agrochemicals throughenhanced marketing strategies that will facilitate contact of marketing agents to prospective customers located in the rural communities.

Authors and Affiliations

Fadipe Ademoye Emmanuel Akinboboye, A. A. , Adigun, Animashaun Jubril Olayinka

Keywords

Related Articles

[b]Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficient of Wheat at Rupandehi District of Nepal[/b]

This study is carried out to estimate the potential evapotranspiration (PET) and crop coefficient (Kc) for Wheat, BL 3235 variety. A lysimeter is installed to estimate PET at the experimental farm of Agricultural Researc...

Determination of Target Exchange Rate for the Comparative Advantage of Iran Crops (A Case of Sari Township)

In this paper, the value of exchange rate was calculated in order to determine comparative advantage in crops of Sari Township during 2009-2010. Hence, first, comparative advantage indices are estimated by using a policy...

[b]Effective Factors Influencing on the Implementation of Knowledge Management in the Agricultural Bank of Qom Province[/b]

The main objective of the present work was to study the factors affecting the deployment of knowledge management in Agriculture Bank of Qom Province. It was a causativerelational study in terms of data col...

[b]Regionalization of the Iowa State University Extension System: Lessons Learned by Key Administrators[/b]

The cyclical economic downturn in the United States has forced many Extension administrators to rethink and adjust services and programming. The Cooperative Extension System (CES), the organization primarily responsible...

 Expected Economic Impacts of Agro-Tourism Development in Rural Areas of Tehran Province (Case Study: Pakdasht County)

 This study determined the situation of rural tourism and agro-tourism in Tehran Province as well as the expected economic impacts of agro-tourism development on it. In this research, we used documental research met...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP100209
  • DOI -
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Fadipe Ademoye Emmanuel Akinboboye, A. A. , Adigun, Animashaun Jubril Olayinka (2014). [b] Assessment of Rural Farming Households WTP for Fertilizers and Agrochemicals in Kwawara State, Nigeria[/b]. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 4(2), 163-170. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-100209