Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016

Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 4

Abstract

Book Reviews: Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2 (Print), 978-3-319-20762-9 (Online). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20762-9

Authors and Affiliations

Francesca Poggiolesi

Keywords

Related Articles

Rational Agency from a Truth-Functional Perspective

The aim of the present paper is to introduce a system, where the epistemic state of an agent is represented truth-functionally. In order to obtain this system, we propose a four-valued logic, that we call the logic of ra...

Category Free Category Theory and Its Philosophical Implications

There exists a dispute in philosophy, going back at least to Leibniz, whether is it possible to view the world as a network of relations and relations between relations with the role of objects, between which these relat...

Sweet SIXTEEN: Automation via Embedding into Classical Higher-Order Logic

An embedding of many-valued logics based on SIXTEEN in classical higher-order logic is presented. SIXTEEN generalizes the four-valued set of truth degrees of Dunn/Belnap’s system to a lattice of sixteen truth degrees wit...

Mereology and Infinity

This paper deals with the treatment of infinity and finiteness in mereology. After an overview of some first-order mereological theories, finiteness axioms are introduced along with a mereological definition of “x is fin...

Sequents for non-wellfounded mereology

The paper explores the proof theory of non-wellfounded mereology with binary fusions and provides a cut-free sequent calculus equivalent to the standard axiomatic system.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP202237
  • DOI 10.12775/LLP.2016.019
  • Views 51
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Francesca Poggiolesi (2016). Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 25(4), 555-560. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-202237