Coherence and correspondence in engineering design: informing the conversation and connecting with judgment and decision-making research
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
I show how the coherence/correspondence distinction can inform the conversation about decision methods for engineering design. Some engineers argue for the application of multi-attribute utility theory while others argue for what they call heuristics. To clarify the differences among methods, I first ask whether each method aims at achieving coherence or correspondence. By analyzing statements in the design literature, I argue that utility theory aims at achieving coherence and heuristics aim at achieving correspondence. Second, I ask if achieving coherence always implies achieving correspondence. It is important to provide an answer because while in design the objective is correspondence, it is difficult to assess it, and coherence that is easier to assess is used as a surrogate. I argue that coherence does not always imply correspondence in design and that this is also the case in problems studied in judgment and decision-making research. Uncovering the conditions under which coherence implies, or does not imply, correspondence is a topic where engineering design and judgment and decision-making research might connect.
Authors and Affiliations
Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677670
- DOI -
- Views 160
- Downloads 0
Healthy choices in context: How contextual cues can influence the persuasiveness of framed health messages
Research has shown that framing messages in terms of benefits or detriments can have a substantial influence on intended behavior. For prevention behaviors, positively framed messages have been found to elicit stronger b...
Thinking dynamics and individual differences: Mouse-tracking analysis of the denominator neglect task
Most decision-making models describing individual differences in heuristics and biases tasks build on the assumption that reasoners produce a first incorrect answer in a quick, automatic way which they may or may not ove...
How the number of options and perceived variety influence choice satisfaction: An experiment with prescription drug plans
This study measures the perceived costs, perceived benefits, choice outcome satisfaction, and choice process satisfaction from consumers making hypothetical choices amongst prescription drug plans. I juxtapose the number...
Aggregating multiple probability intervals to improve calibration
We apply the principles of the “Wisdom of Crowds (WoC)” to improve the calibration of interval estimates. Previous research has documented the significant impact of the WoC on the accuracy of point estimates but only a f...
Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making
In considering moral dilemmas, people often judge the acceptability of exchanging individuals’ interests, rights, and even lives. Here we investigate the related, but often overlooked, question of how people decide who t...