Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 18 March 2015 (Ref. No. II KK 318/14)

Journal Title: Białostockie Studia Prawnicze - Year 2016, Vol 0, Issue 21

Abstract

Envisaging an unconditioned prerequisite of reading aloud a testimony of a witness who resides abroad, the provision of Art. 391 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not make the application of this possibility depend on any additional conditions such as, e.g., a long period of residence abroad and the importance of such evidence being read aloud to the pending proceedings, which does not exempt the court from a duty to establish whether the witness’s residence abroad is a real impediment to implement the principle of immediacy. Th e fact that a witness resides abroad should be treated as a suffi cient prerequisite to read aloud his or her testimony given in preparatory proceedings only if his or her examination before the court is impeded in a way comparable to impossibility of serving him or her with summons or with other insurmountable obstacles.

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Sakowicz

Keywords

Related Articles

Participation of Social Organizations in Juvenile Proceedings – Th eoretical Foundations and Practice

Juvenile law is a rather young branch of law. It was singled out just at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. From the very beginning, the juvenile law regulations could be distinguished into two dominant models: pro...

Autonomy of Local Self-Governments From a Financial Perspective in Hungary

Recently, there has been a constitutional change related to self-governments in Hungary. The article examines the status of Hungarian local governments in comparison with EU member states from a financial perspective. Au...

Voting Rights for Immigrants. Refl ections on the Background of EU Citizenship

Voting rights are traditionally associated with the institution of citizenship. Th is relationship, however,is subjected to change, i.e. under the infl uence of globalization and international migration. Th e scope of mi...

The Right to Education for the Persons with Disabilities. Special View on the Romanian Legislation

The current study starts from the fact that the right to education – a fundamental human right – should be organized in such manner as to ensure equal opportunities for all persons. First of all, it refers to the prohibi...

Th e Mechanism of Quota in the Light of Electoral Code Regulations Introduced in 2011

Th e article describes the process of introducing the electoral quota system into Polish legislation. Th is system is one of the most popular instruments forincreasing the participation of women in politics. Women are un...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342905
  • DOI 10.15290/bsp.2016.21.16
  • Views 47
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrzej Sakowicz (2016). Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 18 March 2015 (Ref. No. II KK 318/14). Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 0(21), 211-217. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-342905