Comparative analysis of 0.4% vs 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution in post operative small incision cataract surgery patients

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

Purpose: The study was to compare the effectiveness and patient tolerability of two strengths of ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution i.e. 0.4% vs 0.5% in post-operative small incision cataract surgery patients. The study was conducted in Sri Guru Ram Dass institute of medical Sciences and research Amritsar. Materials and Method: This is a randomized single blind investigator masked study. Total fifty patients (25 in each group) screened for cataract surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomized and either of study medication was used. Study medications were ketorolac 0.4% and ketorolac 0.5% eye drops. One drop of each drug was instilled in operative patient in each group thrice day. Thereafter, Slit-lamp examination was done for aqueous cell and flare. Intraocular pressure was checked. The patients were evaluated for subjective tolerance postoperatively at days 1, 3, 5 7, 15and 30. The results were compared between the groups, also with baseline. Results: Only difference between two strength ketorolac is less stinging, discomfort and better ocular tolerability of ketorolac 0.4%. The patient operative outcome is same in the both strength. Ketorolac 0.4% has proven to better tolerated on the visual analogue scale. Ocular comfort was also much better. Although this difference is not statistically significant. In other parameters, difference were not observed between the two groups for best-corrected visual acuity, IOP& slit-lamp assessment of cells and flare measured. Conclusions: 0.4% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution is equally effective as 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution in reducing post cataract inflammation. But Patients with 0.4% ketorolac reported less discomfort.

Authors and Affiliations

Manmohan Bhanot, Preet Sood

Keywords

Related Articles

The prospective study of clinico-etiological analysis on patients of papilloedema

Background: As the etiologies of papilloedema are important from prognostic point of view, early recognition of its cause & prompt treatment is required for better visual outcome. Objective: To study the etiology of the...

Comparison of macular thickness in myopia, hypermetropia and emmetropia: An OCT based study

Aim To make a comparative evaluation of macular thickness in myopia and hypermetropia versus emmetropiaMaterials and Methods A crosssectional OCT based study was done in randomly selected 100 emmetropes 93 myopes 67 hype...

Comparison of optical biometry based on partial coherence laser interferometry (PCLI) principle to conventional applanation ultrasonic biometry

Purpose Our aim was to compare the accuracy of intraocular lens IOL power calculation with two techniques namely optical biometry based on partial coherence laser interferometry PCLI principle and conventional ultrasound...

Association of body mass index with severity of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background: Increased body mass index has been found to be associated with microvascular as well as macrovascular complications of diabetes. Factors like insulin resistance, hypertension and dyslipidemia, are found to be...

A study of ocular manifestations of diabetes mellitus in patients attending tertiary care hospital in Pondicherry

Introduction This study was undertaken to find out the ocular manifestations of diabetes mellitus among diabetics reporting to a tertiary health care facility in PondicherryMaterials and Methods Seventy diabetic patients...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP299761
  • DOI 10.18231/2395-1451.2017.0066
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Manmohan Bhanot, Preet Sood (2017). Comparative analysis of 0.4% vs 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution in post operative small incision cataract surgery patients. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 3(3), 267-269. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-299761