Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Alone and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Midazolam Intrathecally for Lower Limb and Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Aim: The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and analgesic effect of mixture of midazolam-bupivacaine as compared to bupivacaine alone in patients undergoing lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries under subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 100 patients aged between 18 to 60 years belonging to ASA Grade I and II of both the sexes posted for lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries. Results: In 100 patients duration of sensory blockade in both group B and group M. the mean duration of sensory blockade in group B is 89.1±2.95 minutes were as in group M, it is 118.94±10.83 minutes, p<0.05, hence statistically significant. (t = 18.5918, p= 0.000, statistically significant). The mean duration of maximum motor blockade in B is 163.3±16.6 with a range being 135 to 210 minutes. In group M, the mean duration of maximum motor blockade is 180.24±27.40 minutes with a range being 152 to 245 minutes. As p value is 0.0004 it is statistically significant. (T=3.693, P value-0.0004, highly significant). In group B, the mean duration of analgesia is 125.46±7.18 minutes with a range of 110 to 142 minutes. In group M, the mean duration of analgesia is 243.26±24.41 minutes with a range of 173 to 273 minutes. In group B, the mean VAS score is 3.98±1 and in group M, it is 3.6±0.6. The t value is 2.869 and the p value is 0.005, hence there is statistical significance between them. Conclusion: It can be inferred that inj. midazolam 1 mg in combination with inj.bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric can be safely administered intrathecally for better postoperative analgesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Konkyana Suresh Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Isobaric 0.5% Ropivacaine with Isobaric 0.5% Bupivacaine in Elective Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

Ropivacaine has a lower and different toxicity profile compared to Bupivacaine. It is a new long­acting, enantiomerically pure (S­enantiomers), amide local anaesthetic with a high pKa and low lipid solubility. T. Ropivac...

A Study on Haemodynamic and Adverse Effects of Intramuscular Parecoxib in Adults for Postoperative Pain Relief

Background: Postoperative pain control is generally best managed by anaesthesiologists since they offer regional anaesthetic techniques as well as pharmacological expertise in analgesics.Various postoperative analgesic m...

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study of Pre-Emptive Oral Flupirtine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries Under General Anesthesia

Introduction: Flupirtine is non-opioid, non-NSAID, centrally acting indirect NMDA receptor antagonist. It's analgesic effect is equivalent to NSAIDs and opioids with devoid of their side effects. Abdominal surgeries are...

To Study and Compare Efficacy of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Caudal Analgesia in Paediatric Patients

Aims and objectives: The aim of the study was to compare quality and duration of intra and post operative analgesia and need of rescue analgesia of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine. and 0.5 ml/kg of 0.2% Ropivacaine. Metho...

Comparision of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgeries

Introduction: Supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block produces the most complete upper limb block as it blocks the brachial plexus at the level of the trunks formed by C5-T1 nerve roots.Ropivacaine is a pure S...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP535336
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5418.1
  • Views 118
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Konkyana Suresh Kumar (2018). Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Alone and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Midazolam Intrathecally for Lower Limb and Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(4), 505-511. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-535336