Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine alone and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Midazolam Intrathecally for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries

Journal Title: International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 8

Abstract

Introduction: Subarachnoid blockade is the common form of central neuraxial blockade performed for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. In order to maximize quality of anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia, a number of adjuvants have been added to spinal local anaesthetics. Intrathecal midazolam abolishes pain of somatic origin, produces selective sensory block, and depresses somatosympathetic reflexes without any neurotoxicity. It potentiates the blocking actions of local anaesthetics. Hence the present study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy and analgesic effect of mixture of spinal midazolam-bupivacaine as compared to bupivacaine alone in patients under going lower limb orthopedic surgery. Material and methods: The present study is conducted after ethical clearance in tertiary hospital in 100 patients aged between 18 to 60 years belonging to ASA Grade I and II of both the sexes posted for elective orthopedic surgeries. The control (B) group received 2.5mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.2mL of normal saline, and the preservative free midazolam group (M) received 2.5mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1mg of midazolam in 0.2mL[preservative free]. The sensory, motor characteristics and haemodynamic variables were studied. The results were statistically analyzed using student-t test. Results: The mean time of onset of the block is reduced, the mean duration of sensory blockade is prolonged and the mean duration of analgesia is prolonged in midazolam group. No significant complications recorded. Conclusion: From the present study it can be concluded that addition of intrathecal midazolam with bupivacaine significantly improves the quality of anaesthesia, duration of analgesia without prolonging the recovery from the anaesthesia.

Authors and Affiliations

M. Venkata Ganesh, P. V. S. Lavanya

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of Clinical Profile of Thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Thrombocytopenia is often the most commonly encountered clinical condition in our routine practice. Etiological causes being numerous, often pose a challenge in evaluating and treating the patients. The obj...

Association of Oral Cancer and Potentially Oral Malignant Disorders with Risk Factors among Textile Industry Workers in Bangalore – A Cross Sectional Survey

Introduction: Oral cancer is a major public health problem in India. The use of tobacco and excessive consumption of alcohol are the prominent risk factors in oral cancer. However the industrial workers observed to have...

Analysis of Laproscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Patients with Gastric Cancer

Introduction: Gastrectomies are performed to treat stomach cancer and perforations of the stomach wall. In this comparative analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy of Laproscopic vs Open gastrectomy for patients with...

Impact of Maternal Anemia at Term on Neonatal Hemoglobin, Sr.iron and Total Iron Binding Capacity

Introduction: There are hardly any studies to see the relation between maternal anemia and cord blood hemoglobin in south India. This study endeavours to study the relation between maternal anaemaia and cord haemoglobin....

A Cross Sectional Study to Evaluate Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ligament Injuries of Knee Joint in a Tertiary Healthcare Institute

Introduction: Ligaments being the most important supporting structures injuries of ligaments and menisci are extremely common especially in active individuals like athletes. However ligament injury of knee in young due t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP424609
  • DOI -
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. Venkata Ganesh, P. V. S. Lavanya (2017). Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine alone and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Midazolam Intrathecally for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 4(8), 1644-1647. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-424609