Comparative Dentoalveolar Assessment of Molar Distalization using Pendulum Appliance and Implant Supported Distalization Appliance – A Prospective Study

Journal Title: International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: Maxillary molar distalization for nonextraction treatment of crowding is a known treatment modality. The aim and objectives of this study was to assess and compare the dentoalveolar effects of treatment with pendulum and implant supported distalization appliance using cephalometric data and model analysis. Material and Methods: The study was carried out using pendulum appliance (Group A) and implant supported appliance (Group B) for distalization of maxillary molars. Total sample size of the study was 10 with each group consisting of 5 patients. Cephalometric and model analysis was done in both the groups. Results: Comparative analysis of pendulum and implant supported distalization appliance using Mann-Whitney U test indicated that there was increased distal inclination of the maxillary Ist molar and proclination of the incisors seen in pendulum group compared to implant group where there was more bodily movement of the Ist molar and retroclination of the incisors. The increase in arch length was similar in both the groups showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Molar angulation of both maxillary right and left Ist molars with P values of 0.0216 and 0.0090 respectively indicated increased disto-palatal molar rotation in the pendulum group. Conclusion: The pendulum group showed marked distal molar movement as compared to implant group. The distal molar movement achieved by pendulum group was more on account of tipping movement than that of bodily movement achieved by implant.

Authors and Affiliations

Madhuli Bhide, Tejashri Pradhan, Abhishek Jain, Roopa Jatti

Keywords

Related Articles

To Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy of Port Site Infiltration of Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Pain Relief after Laproscopic Procedure in Comparison with Bupivacaine

Introduction: Laproscopic procedures have advantages such as less haemorrage, better cosmetic results, lesser post operative time causing lesser hospital stay and less expenditure. The aim of this study was to compare th...

Implementation of Artemisinin based Combination Therapy Policy in Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Private Medicines Outlets: Practice of Medicines Dispenser’s in Mwanza Region, Tanzania

Introduction: A combination of Artemether-lumefantrine (ALu) is recommended by Tanzania MoHSW as first line therapy for uncomplicated malaria while Sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended only for intermittent pre...

Evaluation of Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculus Cholecystitis in Semiurban Setup in Western U.P

Introduction: The common approach for management of acute calculus cholecystitis consist of an initial control of inflammation followed by interval cholecystectomy after a period of 5 weeks. However there is an increased...

A Comparative Study of Nerve Conduction Velocities in Human Beings of Different Age

Introduction: Nerve conduction study is the most sensitive and reproducible measure of peripheral nerve function. The results of these motor and sensory nerve conduction studies are expressed as amplitudes, conduction ve...

Assessment of Efficacy of Bupivacaine Plain Versus Bupivacaine with Fentanyl in Spinal Anaesthesia in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Hip Replacement Surgery: A Comparative Study

Introduction: In comparison to general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia offers numerous advantages. Spinal lignocaine gives shorter span of analgesic block as well as can cause transient neurological side effects, and hen...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP429936
  • DOI -
  • Views 104
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Madhuli Bhide, Tejashri Pradhan, Abhishek Jain, Roopa Jatti (2018). Comparative Dentoalveolar Assessment of Molar Distalization using Pendulum Appliance and Implant Supported Distalization Appliance – A Prospective Study. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 5(2), 5-10. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-429936