Comparative Evaluation of Epidural Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine in Post Operative Analgesia

Journal Title: International Journal of Research and Review - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 10

Abstract

Background and Aims: Clonidine and dexmedetomidine are a-2 adrenergic agonists with analgesic proprieties which potentiate local anesthetic effects when epidurally administered. The present study was undertaken with following aims: 1. To compare onset & duration of analgesia, incidence of side effects and complications of epidural clonidine and dexmedetomidine in post operative analgesia. 2. To study the potentiating effect of epidural clonidine /dexmedetomidine associated with ropivacaine (0.2%) 3. To know hemodynamics related to epidural clonidine and dexmedetomidine. Materials & Methods: After taking institutional approval and consent from patients, the study was carried out on 60 patients of A.S.A. grade I and grade II between 18-50 years. All patients were divided into two groups group 1 and 2 randomly. Group -1: received Ropivacaine 0.2% plus clonidine 1 mcg/kg Group -2: received Ropivacaine 0.2% plus dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. Result: Statistically significant values were observed on comparison of post-operative block characteristics among the two groups (p < 0.001), both for time to two segment regression and time for first rescue top-up. Dexmedetomidine provided a smooth and prolonged post-operative analgesia as compared to clonidine. There was significant change in VAS score at 5 and 10 min post injection of drug in both groups as p value is <0.001 (very highly significant) at both time intervals, but mean VAS sore were higher in clonidine group in comparison to Dexmedetomidine group. There was decreasing trend of mean Pulse rate after 4 hours post injection & this decrease was very highly significant in the RC group (group 1) compared to RD group (group 2). The incidence of dry mouth was significantly higher in both the groups but it was statistically non-significant on comparison (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a better adjuvant than clonidine in epidural post operative analgesia as far as patient comfort, stable cardio-respiratory parameters, and post-operative analgesia is concerned.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Gynendra Kumar Gautam

Keywords

Related Articles

MongoDB with Privacy Access Control

Space, Time and Privacy has become a key requirement for data management systems. The, NoSQL data stores, namely highly compress data on non-relational database management systems, which provides data management of inter...

Symbols, Meaning, and Functions of Simalungun Hiou: Semiotic Studies

Semiotics is the study of sign; every sign or symbol has meaning or message to be conveyed by a communicator to his communicant. The semiotics in this research is used as a method of text analysis when the research tries...

The Urgency of Optimization of Financial Services Authority Supervision against Social Security Governing Body of Health

Social Security Governing Body of Healthor BPJS is one of the agencies established by the government to provide health insurance to every Indonesian citizen. In implementation BPJS there are many problems such as patient...

In-Vitro Estimation of Antioxidant Activity in Green Chilli (Capsicum Annuum) and Yellow Lantern Chilli (Capsicum Chinense)

Chillies are observed as the main commercial vegetables and spice crops at the global level. The interest in its consumption is to a large extent due to its content of bioactive compounds and their importance as dietary...

The Solution of Stereotype Case to Children in Formal School

This research was started from many negative labels or stereotype cases for children done by the people in the school. That labeling of speech was done by them from giving hatred speech to doing discrimination such as ve...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP482406
  • DOI -
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Gynendra Kumar Gautam (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Epidural Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine in Post Operative Analgesia. International Journal of Research and Review, 5(10), 8-16. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-482406