Comparison between lidocaine and 50/50 mixture of lidocaine with bupivacaine when used in inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve block for patients undergoing third molar surgery

Journal Title: International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the onset of action duration of action and analgesia of a 5050 mixture of lidocaine and bupivacaine when injected for surgical extraction of mandibular third molar Materials and Method 50 patients between the age group of 18 to 40 years undergoing bilateral mandibular third molar extractions reporting to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery were chosen for this study Patients underwent extractions of bilateral mandibular third molars with inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve block Extraction of the mandibular third molar on one side was done using 25 NSAIDS taken was recorded at the end of 5th daycc of 2 Lidocaine with 1 80000 adrenaline and the contralateral third molar was extracted using a mixture of 125cc of 2 Lidocaine with 1 80000 adrenaline 125cc of 05 Bupivacaine 5050 mixture Onset of action duration of action was recorded based on EPT Electronic pulp tester response Post operative analgesics Results Independent sample ttest was used for statistical analysis There was a statistical significant difference between two solutions in terms of both onset and duration of action The combination of Lidocaine Bupivacaine offered a prolonged duration of action in the patients undergoing third molar surgery There was no difference in number of analgesics taken in both the groupsConclusion Prolonged duration of action of mixture of local anesthetic agent was not desirable in most minor surgical procedures performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeon Consumption of NSAIDs noted to be same in both the groups makes no advantage of bupivacaine in terms of analgesia There was no clinical advantage of mixing two anesthetic solutions even though Statistical differences noted in two parameters studied Keywords Lidocaine Bupivacaine 5050 mixture Third Molar Surgery

Authors and Affiliations

Pradeep P. S. , Shanavas Palliyal

Keywords

Related Articles

Dermal Fillers

In the modern era of medicine, Dermal fillers are used for aesthetic reasons, the choice of the Dermal filler depends on several factors such as the defect to be corrected, desired longevity and material used. The adjunc...

Forensic Odontology: The Investigative Branch of Dentistry - A Review

The past 100 years has seen the transformation of a previously small and irrevelant area of the human body into a vast science of investigation and research called as forensic odontology. This article is a review of the...

Palatal Perforation Secondary to Tertiary Syphilis: An Uncommon Presentation and Diagnosis of Exclusion

Syphilis is re-emerging as a leading sexually transmitted disease among patients living with acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS]. Dental practitioners are very often seen oral abnormality in the form of palatal pe...

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three different bonding agents under dry & moist conditions- an in vitro study

Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the shear bond strength of self-etch primer and self-adhesive resin cement and to study the effect of adhesion booster on self-adhesive resin cement, under dry and moist c...

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillo-mandibular defects: Case Series

Maxillary and mandibular defects due to congenital abnormalities like clefts, acquired --following surgical intervention of neoplasms (either benign or malignant), or due to traumatic injuries. All such defects require p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP492448
  • DOI 10.18231/2395-499X.2018.0019
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Pradeep P. S. , Shanavas Palliyal (2018). Comparison between lidocaine and 50/50 mixture of lidocaine with bupivacaine when used in inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve block for patients undergoing third molar surgery. International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry, 4(2), 86-88. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-492448