Comparison between volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in COPD patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Journal Title: The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine - Year 2018, Vol 72, Issue 9

Abstract

<strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a well-known independent risk factor for the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Managing ventilation and oxygenation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with creation of pneumoperitoneum) in these patients presents many challenges. <strong>Aim of this study: </strong>was to compare between volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in COPD patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. <strong>Methods: </strong>A case control study was conducted on 60 participants aged between 18 and 60 years, diagnosed with COPD and scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To start with, all patients received volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). Fifteen minutes after creation of pneumoperitoneum, they were randomized to receive either VCV (Group A) or pressure-controlled ventilation; PCV (Group B). Hemodynamics, ventilatory parameters, arterial blood gas analyses were noted. All data were analyzed statistically. <strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between study groups as regards hemodynamic variables. Peak airway pressure was significantly lower in PCV group compared with VCV group. Mean airway pressure was significantly higher in PCV group compared with VCV group. As regards arterial blood gas analyses, there was no significant difference between study groups as regards PaO2 and SpO2. Patients in PCV group had higher PaCO2 (yet not clinically significant) at 35 min, compared with patients in VCV group. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCV and VCV were generally effective in maintaining adequate ventilation, oxygenation and hemodynamic stability. Peak airway pressure was significantly lower in PCV group compared with VCV group, thus decreasing the risk of barotrauma. PCV may be a better choice than VCV in COPD patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors and Affiliations

Eman Helal

Keywords

Related Articles

Role of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography in Assessment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

 Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may be suspected based on the clinical history, physical examination and electrocardiogram findings but imaging is usually central to confirming the diagnosis, establishing a cause...

Role of Automated Breast Ultrasound System (ABUS) as Screening Tool in Comparison To Mammogram in Detect of Different Breast Lesions

<span>Background: </span><span>Mammography is an effective randomized controlled trial-proven method for reducing mortality due to breast cancer. However, the sensitivity of mammography depends on breast density. The cur...

Sonomammography versus MRI in Evaluation of BI-RADS III Breast Lesion

<span>Background: </span><span>Breast cancer is sometimes found after symptoms appear, but many women with breast cancer have no symptoms. This is why regular breast cancer screening is so important, early detection and...

Incidence and Risk Factors for Neonatal Jaundice among Neonates with Urinary Tract Infection in Abha - Saudi Arabia

Background: Hyperbilirubinemia is one of the presenting signs of bacterial infection in newborns, and the association of neonatal jaundice with urinary tract infection (UTI) has been particularly emphasized. The aim of t...

‎‏Awareness and Knowledge of Poor Vision among Students in Hail University

<strong>Background:</strong> Awareness of common eye diseases particularly impaired vision and their prevention and treatment can play an important role in encouraging people to seek timely eye care and can therefore hel...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP584306
  • DOI 10.12816/ejhm.2018.10736
  • Views 91
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eman Helal (2018). Comparison between volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in COPD patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 72(9), 5166-5172. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-584306