Comparison of Clinical Performance of Supraglottic Airway Devices I– gel vs LMA-Proseal in Paediatric Elective Surgeries

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 8

Abstract

Introduction: Newer supraglottic airway devices, LMA-Proseal & I-Gel [2,3] have gastric channel which reduces the risk of aspiration when the baby is placed in lateral for caudal epidural placement [5]. We designed a prospective randomized study in which the clinical performance of I-Gel was compared with LMA-Proseal in paediatric elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Aim of the study: The aim is to compare clinical performance of I-Gel and LMA - Proseal in anaesthetized, spontaneously breathing, paediatric patients posted for elective, below umbilical surgical procedures. Methodology: After getting informed written parental consent and ethical committee approval 100 pediatric cases posted for below umbilical surgeries were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Optimal conditions for supraglottic device insertion were attained with Inj.Propofol 3 mg/kg I.V mixed with Inj. Lignocaine 0.5 mg/kg and 2% to 3% Sevoflurane Either Igel or Proseal was inserted. Ease of insertion, first attempt success rate, Number of attempts,Time taken for insertion, Airway seal pressure Ease of gastric tube placement were monitored. Results: I-Gel supraglottic airway device is advantageous over LMA-Proseal in terms of short insertion time, ease of insertion, ease of gastric tube placement and less incidence of complications in children; whereas LMA- Proseal has got advantage over the I-Gel in regards to high airway sealing pressure. Conclusion: we conclude that I-Gel aids easy and rapid insertion with an acceptable airway seal pressure when compared to proseal. Both devices can be safely used in anaesthetized spontaneously ventilating children for short surgical procedures.

Authors and Affiliations

Punidha Vardhani R

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative Study of Efficacy of Bupivacaine with Dexmeditomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant on Hemodynamic Changes in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

In regional anaesthesia and analgesia, maintaining better hemodynamic stability and minimal side effects is very much essential. A number of adjuvants have been combined with local anaesthesia’s (LA) to improve the effe...

Difficult airway Assessment: Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) and Modified Mallampati Test (MMT)

Airway management is most important job of anaesthesiologists. Difficult airway is assessed mainly comparing different parameters of airway assessment. In this study we mainly compare Upper Lip Bite test (ULBT) and Modif...

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Premedication with Oral Clonidine versus Oral Pregabalin in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

The aim of this study was primarily to compare the efficacy of single pre operative dose of oral pregabalin versus oral clonidine in attenuation of pressor response to direct laryngoscopy and intubation and on the intra...

Comparative Evaluation of Nerve Stimulation and Ultrasound Guidance for Popliteal Block: A Randomized Double Blinded Study

Popliteal block is one of the rarely performed regional anaesthetic techniques because it requires great expertise in anatomical land marks and is often very technically challenging. Recent introduction of ultrasound te...

Comparative Evaluation of Sedation Score and Anxiolysis Level in Intranasal and Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Children

Introduction: Preoperative anxiety in children leading to postoperative negative changes and long-term behavioral problems needs better preanesthetic sedation. Across the world, midazolam is the most commonly used premed...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP536532
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5818.20
  • Views 91
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Punidha Vardhani R (2018). Comparison of Clinical Performance of Supraglottic Airway Devices I– gel vs LMA-Proseal in Paediatric Elective Surgeries. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(8), 1372-1381. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-536532