COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH FENTANYL FOR SEDATION IN TYMPANOPLASTY (ENT SURGERIES) DONE UNDER MONITORED ANAESTHESIA CARE

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 16

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Monitored anaesthesia care involves administering a combination of drugs for anxiolytic, hypnotic, amnestic and analgesic effect. Ideally it should result in less physiological disturbance and allow for more rapid recovery than general anaesthesia. It typically involves administration of local anaesthesia in combination with IV sedatives, anxiolytic and analgesic drugs which is a common practice during various ENT surgical procedures. AIM OF STUDY Is to “Compare Dexmedetomidine with Fentanyl for sedation in tympanoplasty (ENT Surgeries)”. The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an appropriate sedative drug for Monitored Anaesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty (ENT surgeries) METHODS & MATERIALS A total of 60 patients are being recruited into this study with regards to assess, Pain, Discomfort, Sedation, Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SPO2) & Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Mean arterial blood pressure(MAP) & Heart rate This study was undertaken at Govt. ENT Hospital Hyderabad. Sixty (60) patients undergoing Tympanoplasty surgery were taken for study. Thus the study contains 30 patients in Dexmedetomidine group-(Group D) and 30 patients in Fentanyl group (Group F) RESULT Dexmedetomidine provides less discomfort, better sedation, and analgesia when compared with fentanyl under monitored anaesthesia care (Conscious sedation). However, the risk of adverse effects requires monitoring for ready intervention. It provides a unique type of sedation, “conscious sedation” in which patients appear to be sleepy but are easily arousable, cooperative and communicative when stimulated. It is sedative and analgesic agent, with opioid-sparing properties and minimal respiratory depression.

Authors and Affiliations

Illendula Upendranath, Rupa Kumari Amarnath, Deepraj Singh Bais, Shravan Kumar M

Keywords

Related Articles

ULTRASOUND SCREENING OF THYROID GLAND AMONG A SECTION OF POPULATION IN CENTRAL KERALA

BACKGROUND Thyroid diseases are commonest endocrine disorders in India. Studies have shown that one in ten adults in India suffer from hypothyroidism. But it is often underdiagnosed and goes undetected for years. The pre...

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REAMED AND UNREAMED INTRAMEDULLARY INTERLOCKING NAILING IN COMPOUND FRACTURES OF SHAFT OF TIBIA

INTRODUCTION: Whether to ream the compound tibia fractures witle intramedullary interlocking nailing or not has been an eternal debate. So we have conducted a study to compare the functional outcomes, rate of infection a...

DISTAL PALMAR INCISION FOR CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE

BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. Surgical decompression is indicated in whom conservative treatment fails. Open carpal tunnel release has been replaced by...

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING AND DYNAMIC HIP SCREW IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF FEMUR

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of union, complications, operative risks and functional outcomes in intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS and PFN, To compare the results obtained and To compare the effe...

INDUSTRIAL OCULAR TRAUMA- A CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE

BACKGROUND Incidence of ocular injuries is on the rise and is the commonest cause of unilateral blindness. Some individuals are at increased risk of eye injury as a result of their occupation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP233774
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2016/146
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Illendula Upendranath, Rupa Kumari Amarnath, Deepraj Singh Bais, Shravan Kumar M (2016). COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH FENTANYL FOR SEDATION IN TYMPANOPLASTY (ENT SURGERIES) DONE UNDER MONITORED ANAESTHESIA CARE. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 3(16), 638-644. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-233774