COMPARISON OF IN SITU FUSION AND INSTRUMENTATION W1TH FUSION İN TREATMENT OF SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

Journal Title: Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery - Year 1994, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

We are presenting a retrospective study comparing the results of insitu posterolateral fusiorı and instrumenta-tion with posterolateral fusion (with or vvithout reduction) performed in 18 (13 female and 5 male) patients with spondylolisthesis. The mean age was 46 (range 20-63), average follow-up was 3.5 (range 1.5-8) years. There was grade 1 spondylolisthesis in 2 patients, grade 2 in 9, grade 3 in 5, grade 4 in one and grade 5 spondylolisthesis (spondyloptosis) with para-aortic neurofibroma in one patient. We performed in situ posterolateral fusion in 10 patients and posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the remaining 8. Decompression was added in 3 of the cases with instrumentation and reduction in 4 of them. Reduction and decompression were combined in the remaining one patient. in addition to reduction, instrumentation and posterolateral fusion, anterior fusion was also performed in the patient with spondyloptosis. VVhile there were no nonunions in the instrumented group, 2 cases with insitu posterolateral fusion failed to ünite. Infection which responded to intravenous antibiotics and debride-ment occurred in two instrumented cases. Radicular type pain was diminished in ali the patients which we achieved union. When reduction was added, in addition to obtaining good decompression, fusion and radicular pain relief, improvement in low back pain due to mechanical imbalance was observed. The two cases who devel-ope pseudoarthrosis were revised with reduction, decompression, instrumentation and posterolateral fusion; union was obtained in both cases. İn conclusion, insitu posterolateral fusion appears to have a higher rate of pseu-doatrhrosis, but in those cases in which union is achieved, there is not any significant difference in radicular pain relief from those vvhich are instrumented. Addition of reduction distinctly improves mechanical pain as well as the radicular pain. İn the instrumented cases however, Ihe infection rate is higher.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Mümtaz ALPARSLAN, Doğan ATLIHAN, Talat GÖĞÜŞ, M. Nedim DORAL, Günhan KARAKUM

Keywords

Related Articles

CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME DUE TO POSTERIOR SEQUESTERED LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION: A RARE CASE REPORT AND MRI FINDINGS

Posterior epidural disc migration is a very unusual event. Cauda equina syndrome resulting from a posterior epidural disc migration is also quite uncommon. Diagnosis of a posterior migrated disc fragment can be easily ma...

ANALYSIS OF LUMBAR DISCECTOMY OPERATIONS IN ONE YEAR

Objective: The aim of the study is to analyse the lumbar discectomy operations in one year. Materials and Method: We inspected 203 patients who were operated for lumbar disc herniation between March-2015 and March...

POTT DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH PSOAS ABSCESS ORIGINATING FROM LUMBOSACRAL REGION

A 28-year-old female presented with a palpable mass on her right groin and a 6-month history of progressively worsening low back pain. She also had intermittent numbness and tingle on the dorsum and lateral part of the r...

BONE MORPHOGENIC PROTEİN INDUCED HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION CAUSING SPINAL STENOSIS

Objectives: To report a case of late neurolo-gic compromise by heterotopic bone formation after use of human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure. Summary of back...

THORACIC SPINE MIDLINE INJURY WITHOUT MOTOR DEFICIT AFTER STABBING

Spinal cord injuries after stabbing are rare, and incomplete neurological motor deficits occur in most cases due to a partial incision. In this case report, we describe a 32-year-old man who presented in our emergency de...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP676277
  • DOI -
  • Views 124
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Mümtaz ALPARSLAN, Doğan ATLIHAN, Talat GÖĞÜŞ, M. Nedim DORAL, Günhan KARAKUM (1994). COMPARISON OF IN SITU FUSION AND INSTRUMENTATION W1TH FUSION İN TREATMENT OF SPONDYLOLISTHESIS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, 5(2), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-676277