Comparison of induction and recovery characteristics of Propofol and Sevoflurane in daycare adult tonsillectomies

Journal Title: International Archives of Integrated Medicine - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Ambulatory anesthesia is a rapidly growing subspecialty. Although its history is as old as the history of general anesthesia itself, it has emerged as a recognized concept and is evolving over the past couple of decades. Propofol and sevoflurane have increased the ability of the anesthesiologist to provide a successful daycare experience. Aim: To compare the induction and recovery characteristics of propofol and sevoflurane by, the time to loss of consciousness, incidence of apnoea, induction complications, recovery time and incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain when they are used as sole induction and maintenance anaesthetic agents in adult tonsillectomies. Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients scheduled for tonsillectomy were selected. Each patient was randomly allocated to either the propofol or the sevoflurane group by lots. All the patients received glycopyrrolate 5 mcg/kg IV and fentanyl, 2 mcg/kg IV just before induction of anesthesia. Propofol group patients received propofol 2 mg/kg IV and intubated with 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine IV. Sevoflurane group patients induced with sevoflurane 4% by patient-controlled inhalation induction and intubated with 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine IV. The characteristics were compared by assessing the time to loss of consciousness, induction complications such as desaturation, coughing, laryngospasm and patient movement, the incidence of apnoea, time of Phase 1 and Phase 2 recovery. Results: Induction with sevoflurane was slower than propofol. The incidence of apnoea was equal in both groups. Phase 1 and 2 recovery times were comparable between both the groups. Sevoflurane anesthesia was associated with high Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) and postoperative pain rate which is statistically not significant. Conclusion: The smoother induction and less postoperative PONV with propofol make it an ideal anaesthetic agent than sevoflurane for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult outpatient surgeries.

Authors and Affiliations

R Ahila, Ganapathy Asokan

Keywords

Related Articles

TB ascitis in cirrhosis of liver - A case report

To diagnose the cause of ascitis in cirrhosis of liver is difficult clinically as fluid is also present in cirrhosis with portal hypertension. The other diseases causing ascitis can also occur in cirrhosis of liver with...

Perception of dental undergraduates and interns on radiation protection safety protocol - A questionnaire based cross-sectional study

Background: Radiographs are an important diagnostic tool for dental professionals. X-rays have the ability to penetrate human tissues. Nowadays, it is mandatory to follow ALARA principle “As Low As Reasonably Achievable”...

Patterns of respiratory tract lesions - A cytohistopathological analysis

Background: Respiratory tract lesions are commonest for which patients attend the chest clinics. The lesions may be inflammatory or neoplastic. Materials and methods: 594 patients attending to chest clinics and admitt...

The prevalence of undiagnosed thyroid dysfunction and diagnosed diseases of gallstones

Background: Cholelithiasis is a disease prevalent worldwide because of an imbalance of bile salt and cholesterol concentrations that leads to precipitation inside the gallbladder. Gall stones are the most common biliary...

A study on causes and management of acute scrotal conditions

Acute scrotal conditions form a significant proportion of cases in surgical ward. They contribute to significant morbidity in younger age group and mortality in older age group. In this study we have attempted to study t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP674986
  • DOI -
  • Views 111
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

R Ahila, Ganapathy Asokan (2019). Comparison of induction and recovery characteristics of Propofol and Sevoflurane in daycare adult tonsillectomies. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 6(3), 156-163. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-674986