Comparison of Pain Scores During Retrieval of Ureteral Stents Using Rigid Cystoscope Versus Rigid Ureteroscope in an Office Setting: A Prospective Study

Journal Title: Journal of Urological Surgery - Year 2020, Vol 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Objective: Ureteral stents inserted to prevent obstruction to the flow of urine need to be removed after they serve the purpose of their insertion. The most commonly practiced method for stent removal is using a rigid cystoscope in an office setting. However, it is quite painful and may require general anesthesia especially in males. Due to their small caliber, rigid ureteroscope can reduce patient discomfort during ureteral stent retrieval procedure. In this study, we compared the pain scores during ureteral stent retrieval using a rigid cystoscope and a rigid ureteroscope. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 64 male patients with ureteral stents who were divided into two groups. Group A had 36 patients who underwent stent retrieval with rigid cystoscope while group B had 28 patients who underwent with rigid ureteroscope. Pain experienced during the procedure and during the first void thereafter were recorded using visual analog scale. Results: The patients who underwent stent retrieval using rigid cystoscope (mean 7.05±1.21) had a significantly higher (p<0.0001) pain score compared to those who underwent it using rigid ureteroscope (mean 2.57±1.04). The pain scores during the first void after the procedure as reported by patients in groups A and B were 6.58±1.27 and 3.03±0.96 (p<0.0001), respectively. Conclusion: Rigid ureteroscopic stent retrieval is a less painful, safe, and dependable method, with a reduced requirement for postoperative analgesics as compared to rigid cystoscopic stent retrieval.

Authors and Affiliations

Siddalingeshwar I Neeli, Sree Harsha Nutalpati

Keywords

Related Articles

A Rare Variant of Urethral Duplication: Type-3 Bladder and Complete Urethral Duplication

Urethral duplication is a rare congenital anomaly with several anatomical variations. Persistence of duplicated urethra and related sphincter mechanism are mainly the reasons for the symptoms. We here present a 9-month-o...

Efficacy and Predictive Factors of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Review of One-thousand-nine-hundred-ninety- seven Patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in a large patient group treated with SWL due to kidney stone. Materials and Methods: Data of 1997...

Contents of Urinary System Stones in North Marmara Region and Their Distribution by Gender

Objective: We aimed to determine the contents of kidney stones in our country by evaluating the results of the stone analysis of patients who underwent surgery due to ureteral or kidney stones or experienced spontaneous...

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Shock Wave Lithotripsy?: Comparison of the Effects on Renal Functions by Glomerular Filtration Rate

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and schok wave lithoripsy (SWL) interventions on renal functions by analyzing glomerular filtration rate (GFR...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP688714
  • DOI 10.4274/jus.galenos.2020.3311
  • Views 145
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Siddalingeshwar I Neeli, Sree Harsha Nutalpati (2020). Comparison of Pain Scores During Retrieval of Ureteral Stents Using Rigid Cystoscope Versus Rigid Ureteroscope in an Office Setting: A Prospective Study. Journal of Urological Surgery, 7(3), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-688714