Comparison of Refractive Error Measurements between KR-1W Wavefront Analyser and KR-8800 Automatic Refractometer in School Children

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: A number of methods and instruments, such as retinoscopy, Hartmann-Shack sensor, ray tracing method and rotary prism technology, are available for assessing refractive status in clinic. The literature on comparison of refractive error values between KR-1W wavefront analyser and KR-8800 automatic refractometer is not adequately available. Aim: To compare refractive error measurements taken by KR-1W wavefront analyser and KR-8800 automatic refractometer and study factors influencing the refractive error values, such as age and gender. Materials and Methods: As a prospective observational study, one eye of 57 school children underwent refractive error measurements with the sequence of KR-8800 and KR-1W with the time interval less than five minutes under no cycloplegic condition. The interdevice agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and paired two-tailed t-test. Vector analysis was used to compare astigmatism measurements. Results: The spherical power values measured by the KR-8800 were significantly more negative about 0.16±0.51 diopter than those of the KR-1W (p=0.024). The cylinder power values measured by the KR-8800 were significantly more positive about 0.11±0.32 diopter than those of the KR-1W (p=0.014). Moreover, KR-8800 and KR-1W were significantly different in astigmatism measurements using vector analysis. There was a significant linear correlation between the KR-8800 and KR-1W instruments for the spherical error (r=0.974, p<0.0001), cylinder power (r=0.807, p<0.0001). The interdevice 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) range for the spherical error and cylinder power were 2.02 D and 1.25 D, respectively. Age negatively correlated with spherical error and cylinder power and the spherical error showed much more negative correlation values than cylinder power. However, gender showed no significant correlations with neither spherical error nor cylinder power of both instruments. Conclusion: The spherical power and astigmatism showed significant difference between the KR-1W and KR-8800 devices. However, the measurements of the two instruments showed significant linear correlation to each other.

Authors and Affiliations

Jing Dong, Qiang Wu, Xiaogang Wang

Keywords

Related Articles

Cholesterol Management in Indians: Should We Treat the Targets or Treat the Risk?

Abstract Clinical evidence on relationship between cholesterol and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) has highlighted the importance of all lipid components in the pathogenesis of CVD, thereby generating the concepts of “targe...

Morphologic Characterisation of 1693 Cholecystecomy Specimens- A Study from Tertiary Care Center in Northern India

ABSTRACT Introduction: Cholecystectomies are most common surgical specimens sent in pathology laboratories. Most common histologically identified lesion of gallbladder is chronic cholecystitis which on most occasions is...

Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential in Preterm Infants and its Relation with Gestational Age

ABSTRACT Introduction: Preterm births are associated with different neuro developmental abnormalities. During the last trimester of pregnancy, a part of foetal brain development occurs. Some area of the brain does not sh...

Focal Reactive Overgrowths: Case Series with Review of Literature

Focal Reactive Overgrowths (FROGs) are commonly occurring mucosal lesions in oral cavity. FROGs include Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia (FFH), Pyogenic Granuloma (PG), Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma (POF) and Peripheral Giant Ce...

Evaluation of Semen Oxidative Stress and Sperm DNA Damage in Cases of Unexplained Foetal Congenital Anomalies- A Pilot Study

Introduction: Birth defects lead to significant neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although, maternal factors have been widely studied, paternal factors have not received much attention. Inherent integrity of the sperm DN...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP524072
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34555.11663
  • Views 200
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jing Dong, Qiang Wu, Xiaogang Wang (2018). Comparison of Refractive Error Measurements between KR-1W Wavefront Analyser and KR-8800 Automatic Refractometer in School Children. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(6), 9-12. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-524072