Comparison of the prediction accuracy of six new generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas
Journal Title: Eye Science (Yanke Xuebao) - Year 2023, Vol 38, Issue 12
Abstract
[Objective:] This study aimed to compare the accuracy of six new generation intraocular lenses (IOL) refractive power calculation formulas (Barrett Universal Ⅱ [BU Ⅱ], Emmetropia Verifying Optical [EVO], Hill-Radial Basis Function [Hill-RBF], Kane, Ladas Super Formula [LSF], T2) and traditional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T). [Methods:] The patients who received cataract surgery in the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2022 to June 2022 were included in this study. Age, gender, axial length (AL), mean keratometry, anterior chamber depth, IOL constant and power, and postoperative refraction results were collected. The prediction accuracy of these ten IOL power calculation formulas was analyzed, including mean prediction error (ME) and its standard deviation, mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error (MedAE), maximum absolute prediction error (MaxAE), the percentage of eyes of PE within the range of ±0.25 D, ±0.5 D, ±0.75 D, ±1.0 D (%±0.25 D, %±0.50 D, %±0.75 D, %±1.00 D). [Results:] 506 eyes of 506 patients were included. Kane has the lowest MAE (0.411). %±0.25 D of Hill-RBF was the highest (40.91%), %±0.50 D or %±0.75 D of EVO was the highest (69.37%, 86.17%), and %±1.00 D of BU Ⅱ and Hill-RBF was the highest (94.07%). There are significant differences in MAE, %±0.50 D, %±0.75 D, and %±1.00 D among all formulas (P<0.05). Still, pairwise comparison only found differences between EVO (86.17%), Hill-RBF (85.97%), Kane (85.57%), and Hoffer Q (81.42%) in %±0.75 D (all P<0.05). In AL subgroup, the MAE of EVO (0.390), Hill-RBF (0.388), T2 (0.423) and Kane (0.393) in long AL group was different from that of Hoffer Q (0.681) and Holladay 1 (0.654) (all P<0.05), the difference of %±0.50D of EVO (74.47%) compared with Hoffer Q (46.81%) (P=0.017). [Conclusion:] The new generation of IOL power calculation formulas have good accuracy in IOL power prediction, but for eyes with different axial lengths and keratometry, it is necessary to optimize the selection of formulas to improve the prediction accuracy further.
Authors and Affiliations
Kaijing ZHOU, Jianqi MEI, Lin ZHEN, Jiangjian HU, Ayong YU
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP764702
- DOI 10.12419/2308290001
- Views 8
- Downloads 0
Two-stage capsular tension ring fixation technique on the surgical treatment of congenital ectopia lentis
Congenital ectopia lentis is a relatively rare zonular disorder of the lens, and its surgical treatment is extremely challenging. The traditional surgical procedures represented by intraocular lens suspension are prone t...
Optimization of intraocular lens constant of a hybrid intraocular lens
[Objective:] To assess the benefits of intraocular lens (IOL) constant optimization of Alcon Acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 (PanOptix) on the accuracy of IOL power calculation, and the effects of constant optimization betwee...
Comparative analysis of the bacterial spectrum in chronic dacryocystitis between northern and southern China
[Objective:] To compare the bacterial distribution of patients with chronic dacryocystitis from southern China and northwest China and to elucidate the geographical differences in the bacterial spectrum. [Methods:] This...
Glaucoma in Hallermann-Streiff syndrome: case series report and literature review
[Objective:] To demonstrate the clinical characteristics and surgical effects of glaucoma in Hallermann-Streiff syndrome (HSS). [Methods:] Observational case series and literature review. The results of ophthalmic examin...
Training effectiveness survey of diagnosis and treatment for chalazion from ophthalmology trainees’ perspective in resident standardized training
[Objective:] To explore the teaching effect of diagnosis and treatment on chalazion in the standardized training of ophthalmology residents and its existing problems, in order to improve the quality of the training syste...