COMPARISON OF THREE SLEEP QUESTIONNAIRES IN SCREENING OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 88

Abstract

BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterised by full or partial occlusion of the upper airway during sleep. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder affecting at least 2% to 4% of the adult population and can occur in all age groups. The aim of our study is to assess the usefulness of Berlin, STOP-BANG and Epworth questionnaires in evaluation of obstructive sleep apnoea and to find specificity and sensitivity of Berlin, STOP-BANG and Epworth questionnaires in predicting diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study aimed at predicting high risk of OSA based on using three questionnaires in comparison to the objective assessment using the standard overnight attended PSG on all the recruited patients. The study was conducted over 62 patients at the sleep disorders laboratory of pulmonary medicine, Sri Ramachandra University Hospital, Porur, Chennai. Anthropometric measures including body weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and neck circumference (NC) as well as gender were documented for all patients. RESULTS The incidence of OSA in our study population was 87% of which percentage of population with mild, moderate and severe OSA were 24%, 20.9% and 41.9%. The above results show that the Berlin questionnaire score is a better tool than the STOP-BANG and Epworth score, since the average accuracy of Berlin questionnaire was 66.65. CONCLUSION The above results show that the Berlin questionnaire score is a better tool than the STOP-BANG and Epworth score, since the average accuracy of Berlin questionnaire was 66.65. Large prospective studies will be required to help establish the exact role of subjective Berlin, STOP-BANG and Epworth sleep screening questionnaires in evaluating patient with OSA.

Authors and Affiliations

Preethi Perumalsamy, Arvin Kumar Charles, Gangi Reddy, Chandrasekar Chokkalingam, Rajagopalan Balakrishnan

Keywords

Related Articles

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON PATIENTS OF CARCINOMA LARYNX ATTENDING TERTIARY CARE CENTRES IN HYDERABAD, TELANGANA

BACKGROUND Laryngeal cancer is the eleventh most common cancer in men worldwide, but is relatively uncommon in women. Cancer larynx constitutes 2.63% of all body cancers in India. Tobacco smoking and alcohol are the majo...

A STUDY OF QUALITY OF SLEEP IN PEOPLE WITH MENTAL ILLNESS WITH SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT

BACKGROUND Sleep disturbances have become a common co-morbid condition in psychiatric illnesses. Even after treating the immediate psychiatric symptoms, some individuals have difficulties in sleep and their quality of sl...

 COMPARISON OF ROLE OF IVP AND USG IN EVALUATING URETERIC CALCULI DISEASE

 The incidence of urolithiasis varies according to geographic area, age, and sex distribution. 1 Various studies have shown that in economically developed countries the prevalence rate ranged between 4% and 20%....

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CELL BLOCK WITH CONVENTIONAL SMEAR CYTOLOGY IN DIAGNOSING SEROUS EFFUSIONS- A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND Conventional cytology is the branch of pathology dealing in diagnosis of various fluids. But screening of remaining residue, which is not processed may be of paramount importance for diagnosis. The residual ma...

BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus is a progressive disease, diabetic foot is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus and eventually leads to development of gangrene and lower extremity amputation. This study has b...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP277904
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2017/1332
  • Views 104
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Preethi Perumalsamy, Arvin Kumar Charles, Gangi Reddy, Chandrasekar Chokkalingam, Rajagopalan Balakrishnan (2017). COMPARISON OF THREE SLEEP QUESTIONNAIRES IN SCREENING OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 6(88), 6132-6136. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-277904