CONTROVERSIES REGARDING THE ARBITRAL INSTITUTION DESIGNATED BY SUB-CLAUSE 20.6 OF FIDIC CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT TO ADMINISTER THE ARBITRAL CASES RESULTED FROM EXECUTION OF PUBLIC WORKS UNDER THE ROMANIAN LAW

Abstract

From 2010 to 2017 the execution of public works in Romania took place by virtue of the General Conditions of Contract of FIDIC Yellow Book or Red Book approved by Government Decision no. 1405/2010. In 2011 the Romanian Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure issued Order no. 146/2011 whereby it approved standard forms of Particular Conditions of Contract, Appendix to Tender and Contract Agreement for execution of such public works. In particular, the Appendix to Tender modified the provisions of Sub-Clause 20.6 regarding the arbitral institution empowered to administer the disputes resulted from public procurement contracts based on FIDIC Conditions of Contract. The mention included in the Appendix to Tender in this regard referred to ”the Court of International Commercial Arbitration”, apparently an incomplete reference to the Court of International Commercial Arbitration attached to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania. Encouraged by a subjective interpretation of the contractual provisions, a significant number of contractors submitted their disputes with the National Company for Administration of Road Infrastructure in Romania to the ICC International Court of Arbitration. Recently, the Bucharest Court of Appeals decided that this approach was wrong, setting aside the final partial awards issued under the auspices of the ICC International Court of Arbitration. In an attempt to clarify which arbitral institution has jurisdiction to administer such arbitral cases, this paper analyzes the controversial contractual provisions, the soundness of the various interpretation and arguments brought by the involved parties under the rules of interpretation provided by the Romanian Law and internationally applicable custom in arbitration, and the recent jurisprudence of Romanian Courts related to this matter.

Authors and Affiliations

Cristian Răzvan RUGINĂ

Keywords

Related Articles

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE CHOICE, BY THE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS, OF THE LEGAL BASIS OF ACTS, DURING THE LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURES OVERVIEW OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

An important moment in the conduct of legislative procedures within the European Union is located right at their onset. Thus, the initiator of an act finds himself in a position to have recourse to its legal basis, since...

THE RIGHT OF THE DONOR/RECIPENT TO INFORMATION IN THE CASE OF TRANSFER AND TRANSPLANT OF ORGANS, TISSUES AND HUMAN CELLS FOR THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES

The current study starts from the fact that, in the contemporary society, the patient can no longer be considered a simple consumer of services totally subordinated to the doctor, but he is an active participant in the p...

OVERCROWDING – CURRENT ISSUES IN ROMANIAN DETENTION CENTERS. CAUSES, EFFECTS AND REMEDIES

The overcrowding phenomenon in detention centers generates serious issues with respect to the human dignity – corollary of the fundamental human rights. Both international legislation and the jurisprudence of the Europea...

A RESEARCH ON POLICIES FOR GREEN ECONOMY IN DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPİNG COUNTRİES WİTHİN THE SCOPE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

With the increasing population since the existence of mankind technology has developed the use of resources which increased with development of technology and production and environmental destruction has been the result...

THE CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION OF THE RIGHT TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

Paradoxically, for some of us, and first of all, our lives depend on the Planet Earth on which we live. A healthy Planet Earth will allow us a beautiful, long and healthy life. In international treaties or conventions, a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP589161
  • DOI -
  • Views 176
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Cristian Răzvan RUGINĂ (2019). CONTROVERSIES REGARDING THE ARBITRAL INSTITUTION DESIGNATED BY SUB-CLAUSE 20.6 OF FIDIC CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT TO ADMINISTER THE ARBITRAL CASES RESULTED FROM EXECUTION OF PUBLIC WORKS UNDER THE ROMANIAN LAW. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 378-385. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-589161