Critique of two decicions of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Srpska

Journal Title: Godisnjak Fakulteta pravnih nauka - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

The subject of this paper are two decisions of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Srpska which set in motion not only the question of constitutionality of one statute from the area of social insurance, but the questions of internal morality of the state and law as well. Beginning part of the paper is preceding to introduction into that problem, and in the beginning part the author, by the example from the judicial practice, point out an unconstitutional practice due to which in the area of social insurance is infringed the right on property by inactivity of competent organs of public authority. The infringement of the same right is caused by statute provisions analised in the paper. It is word on provisions of the Law on social insurance in the Republic of Srpska, by which is prescribed that the pensions will be determined again for some of beneficiaries, what in practice means that their pensions will be decreased, and that for some of other beneficiaries it will not be done. This unconstitutional behaviour of legislator, due to which the right on property and equality before the law are infringed, are tried to be resolved by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Srpska in its two decisions by opinion according to which it is a matter of policy of legislator and suitability to prescribe whether the pensions will be determined again for all or for some beneficiaries. This opinion is exposed to the criticism in the paper.

Authors and Affiliations

Milan Blagojević

Keywords

Related Articles

Raspad federalizma u Jugoslaviji-Dissolution of Federalism in Yugoslavia

The author gives an overview of the development of the federal system in Yugoslavia since the end of World War II until its complete collapse of the nineties. One of the reason for establishing the federalism in the form...

Subordinate Positon of a Pledge Law in Republika Srpska

One of the basic and most important principles of pledge law is a principle of subordination. Pledge law is a dependent law and its existence is dependant on existence of legal validity of the active claims and cessation...

Alternative Sanctions in the Gap Between the Law and Reality

This paper deals with some alternative sanctions of the criminal legislation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Author pays attention to, first of all, replacing short-term imprisonment with the common good in freedom and house...

Guilty Plea Agreement in Proceedings Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia

Guilty plea agreement is a new legal concept in the criminal procedure legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina that was accepted under foreign influences. While frequently applied, a number of contentious issues still rema...

Maternity Contract based on the birth for someone else

The Draft of the Serbian Civil Code provides for a new contract for the birth for another person, on the basis of which the parental relationship is established. This contract obligates the surrogate mother to carry and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342152
  • DOI -
  • Views 81
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Milan Blagojević (2015). Critique of two decicions of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Srpska. Godisnjak Fakulteta pravnih nauka, 5(5), 114-121. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-342152