Decision importance as a cue for deferral

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 5

Abstract

A series of 7 experiments found that people defer important decisions more than unimportant decisions, and that this is independent of choice set composition. This finding persists even when deferral does not provide more flexibility (Experiment 2), when deferral has potential disadvantages (Experiment 3), and when deferral has no material benefits and is financially costly (Experiment 4). The effect of importance on deferral was independent of potential choice conflict (Experiment 5 & 6). The only exception was a situation in which one alternative was clearly dominant; here decision importance did not affect the likelihood of deferral (Experiment 7). These results suggest that people use decision importance as a cue for deferral: more important decisions should take more time and effort.

Authors and Affiliations

Job M. T. Krijnen, Marcel Zeelenberg and Seger M. Breugelmans

Keywords

Related Articles

The attraction effect in motor planning decisions

In motor lotteries the probability of success is inherent in a person’s ability to make a speeded pointing movement. By contrast, in traditional economic lotteries, the probability of success is explicitly stated. Decisi...

Learning to communicate risk information in groups

Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, & Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability est...

Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect

Two experiments examined moral judgments about a decision-maker’s choices when he chose a sure-thing, 400 out of 600 people will be saved, or a risk, a two-thirds probability to save everyone and a one-thirds probability...

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: On risk aversion in behavioral decision-making

Some studies have found that choices become more risk averse after gains and more risk seeking after losses, although other studies have found the opposite. The latter tend to use hypothetical cases that encourage delibe...

Thinking dispositions and cognitive reflection performance in schizotypy

Schizotypy refers to the continuum of normal variability of psychosis-like characteristics and experiences, often classified as positive schizotypy (‘unusual experiences’; UE) and negative schizotypy (‘introvertive anhed...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678193
  • DOI -
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Job M. T. Krijnen, Marcel Zeelenberg and Seger M. Breugelmans (2015). Decision importance as a cue for deferral. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678193