Diagnostic Scores for Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Scores’ Performance

Journal Title: Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research - Year 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Aims: Several scoring systems have been developed for diagnosis of appendicitis. This study aims to systematically explore how those scores were derived and validated, and to compare their performance. Study Design: Systematic review. Place and Duration of Study: We searched Medline from 1949 and EMBASE from 1974 to March 2012 to identify relevant articles published in English. Methodology: Information about model development and performance was extracted. The “risk of bias” assessment tool was developed based on a critical appraisal guide for clinical prediction rules. Calibration (O/E ratio) and discrimination (C-statistic) coefficients were estimated. A meta-analysis was applied to pool calibration coefficients and C-statistics. Results: Forty-four out of 468 studies were eligible. Of these, 14 developed or modified diagnostic scoring systems and 30 validated existing models. Four scores had been most frequently validated, i.e., Alvarado, modified Alvarado, Fenyo, and Eskelinen. Among them, only the Eskelinen model was derived based on a multivariate regression whereas the rest used univariate or non-statistical methodology. All studies reported very good but imprecise calibration. For discrimination, the pooled C-statistics for these corresponding scores were 0.77, 0.86, 0.81, and 0.84 respectively. In the external validation, the discriminative performance decreased about 25.3% and 10.1% for the Alvarado and Fenyo scores respectively. Conclusion: The research methods for scoring systems of appendicitis were inconsistent. More efficient scoring systems which have been internally and externally validated are required.

Authors and Affiliations

Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Napaphat Poprom, Mark McEvoy, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian

Keywords

Related Articles

The Effect of Epidural Labour Analgesia on Neonatal Outcomes: A Prospective Randomised Study

Introduction: Epidural analgesia is said to have depressive effects on neonates. There seems to be sufficient instances in the literature that have compared maternal outcomes in relation to epidural analgesia. However, t...

A Study of Malnutrition-dependent Factors among Under-five Children in Ekureku Community, Abi Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria

Malnutrition is the consumption of dietary nutrients either insufficiently or exclusively, and several socio-economic, ignorance, and educational factors are known to determine nutritional status of any community. This s...

Gastrointestinal Pain Suspected a Stressor Leading to the Onset of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report

Aims: To investigate a case of the mid-ventricular variant of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), stress-induced cardiomyopathy, and evaluate if gastrointestinal pain may also contribute to this cardiomyopathy. Presentation...

Delivery Safety of Women from Tribal and Non-tribal Areas, in the State of Maharashtra, India

Aims: The study was conducted to obtain information about place and mode of child delivery and compare unsafe deliveries between tribal and non-tribal areas. Study Design: This was a retrospective study with the follow...

Analysis of Human Resources for Eye Health in Ogun State of Nigeria: Progress towards Vision 2020

Aims: To conduct a situational analysis of human resources for eye health (HReH) and assess its progress towards vision 2020 goals in Ogun state of Nigeria. Study Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Place and Du...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP348549
  • DOI 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/5255
  • Views 72
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Napaphat Poprom, Mark McEvoy, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian (2014). Diagnostic Scores for Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Scores’ Performance. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 4(2), 711-730. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-348549