Difference Between any Morphological and Physiological Characters of three Sugar Beet Genotypes in Different Irrigation Treatments

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of irrigation period on the quality and quantity of yield and some morphological and physiological traits of three multigerm sugar beet genotypes named BP Mashhad, BP Karaj and 191. The experiment was in a split plot based on randomized complete block design , carried out at Motahari Research station of Sugar beet Seed Research Institute in Kamalabad , Karaj in 2005. The main plots consisted of three irrigation periods, non-stress, medium stress and sever stress (80, 130 and 180 mm evaporation from class A pan , respectively) and the sub plots consisted of three genotypes. Irrigation treatments were applied at 6-8 leaf stage. The amount of irrigated water in each treatment was measured by WSC flom. Based on the results, the mean root yield of each treatment was 37.97(non-stress), 17.78(medium stress) and 15.46 (severe stress) ton/ha, and dry root weight of each treatment was 850 (non-stress) , 459(medium stress) and 15.46 (severe stress) g/m2. All the factors used affected yield, leaf area index , dry root and shoot weight in severe stress condition compared to the non-stress condition . The severe stress condition decreased root yield but increased sugar contents. Drought stress also decreased other measured traits such as root dry weight, total dry weight and leaf area index. Two genotypes BP Mashhad and BP Karaj were evaluated as drought tolerant genotypes.

Authors and Affiliations

Navid Adibifard| Department of Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran, Farzad Paknejad| Asistant Professor, Agriculture Faculty, Islamic Azad University of Karaj, Karaj, Iran, S. R. Hassanpour Avanji| Young Researchers and Elite Club, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran, M. Shojaei Poor| Young Researchers and Elite Club, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Keywords

Related Articles

A Study on the Potential of Ochratoxin Production by Aspergillus Sp. of Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces and Ochrotoxin Rate of Producing Grown Cell Biomass in the Laborating Conditions

Objective: Molds produce poisons called mycotoxins,OTA is one of the most relevant mycotoxins which is generally produced by Aspergillus, its presence in food and feed products being regulated in many countries. Method...

Evaluation of the Effect of Various Amounts of Humic Acid on Yield, Yield Components and Protein of Chickpea Cultivars (Cicer Arietinum L.)

Objective: In addition to the role of organic matter in plant nutrition, this material improves soil quality, physical structure, ventilation and water supply, and ease of penetration and expansion is rooted deep in th...

Streptomycetes: Characteristics and Their Antimicrobial Activities

The Streptomycetes are gram positive bacteria with a filamentous form that present in a wide variety of soil including composts, water and plants. The most characteristic of Streptomycetes is the ability to produce sec...

Using Simulated Annealing (SA), Evolutionary Algorithm To Determine Optimal Dimensions of Clay Core in Earth Dams

Earth dam is a structure as homogeneous or non-homogeneous forms for raising water level or water supply. Earth dam consist of different parts that one of the main parts is clay core. Choosing an optimal non permeable...

Valuation of Factors Affecting Weaknesses Insufficiency of the Legal Rules Tourism in Iran

Tourism industry is emerging as a new era, one of the main pillars of the economy, the business world. Many planners and policy makers in the development of the tourism industry as the main pillars of sustainable devel...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP12996
  • DOI -
  • Views 337
  • Downloads 13

How To Cite

Navid Adibifard, Farzad Paknejad, S. R. Hassanpour Avanji, M. Shojaei Poor (2014). Difference Between any Morphological and Physiological Characters of three Sugar Beet Genotypes in Different Irrigation Treatments. International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2(1), 238-247. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-12996