DIFFERENCES IN THE DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY FROM THE COMPETENCE OF STATE AUTHORITIES AND FORMAL COMMISSION

Abstract

The article is devoted to a brief analysis of delegated law-making, as a kind of legal activity. The delegation of powers is described as an integral part of delegated law-making. Also, the main signs by which it is possible to distinguish delegation of powers from the competence of state authorities and official order. Delegated lawmaking operates most concretely and efficiently, due to the ability to compensate for certain gaps and legal and technical deficiencies in legislative and regulatory legal acts. The regulation of public relations with the help of delegated law-making will be most effective in the following cases: completely lack of legal regulation of specific types of social relations; social relations are regulated in the general (abstract) form and need to be specified; legislation does not have the capacity to cover the diversity of social relations for regulation. Delegated powers are an integral part of delegated lawmaking, since they are carried out by way of empowerment (that is, the provision (delegation) of certain powers that the subject had not previously had) of one (higher) authority of the state to another (lower). Delegation of powers implies that the delegating body, passing a certain set of powers does not exclude them from their own competence, even for the period of delegation. In addition, the delegating body of public authority at any time has the right to revoke the regulatory act on the delegation of legislative powers and to resolve the issue at its own discretion.

Authors and Affiliations

П. О. Грималюк, Д. О. Коваль

Keywords

Related Articles

Regarding the responsibility of the public administration for a violation of rights, freedoms and interests of individuals, the rights and interests of legal persons in the sphere of public relations

Each person is by nature individual, quaint and unique. What's more, each of us has a destiny, a goal, and therefore a task. In this context, it will not be unnecessary to remind people that they are part of your nation,...

THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE EMPLOYER’S MATERIAL LIABILITY

The article deals with analyzing the basic modern scientific approaches to understanding the regulation of the employer’s material liability under labor law of Ukraine. Controversial problems of material liability of the...

COUNTERING THE PROLIFERATION OF SMUGGLING IN THE BORDER AREAS OF UKRAINE

The article considers theoretical issues of determining the content of the smuggling activities. Deals with the topical issues of the Commission of smuggling, the preconditions of its distribution in the border areas. Th...

THE ARMED FORCES OF UKRAINE AS A COMPONENT OF THE SECURITY AND DEFENSE SECTOR OF THE STATE

The article analyzes and substantiates the need to improve the basic legal acts regulating the activity of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Security and Defense Sector, as it is the Ukrainian Armed Forces that plays t...

DEMOCRACY AND TOTALITARIANISM. COMPROMISE IN HONOR TO DEMOCRACY. AN IDEAL POLITICAL SYSTEM OR «BETWEEN TWO EVILS, YOU SHOULD CHOOSE THE LESSER ONE?»

Today democracy and totalitarianism are two the most controversial political doctrines, that have been developing by couple of historic scientists around the world. Someone of them says, that these systems are totally di...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP477484
  • DOI -
  • Views 79
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

П. О. Грималюк, Д. О. Коваль (2017). DIFFERENCES IN THE DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY FROM THE COMPETENCE OF STATE AUTHORITIES AND FORMAL COMMISSION. Юридичний науковий електронний журнал, 6(), 25-27. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-477484